>>4357926Bud, you're doubling down on your stupidity and ego.
First off, looking at contact prints through a loupe is part of my job as an autistic large format contact printer. I do it to learn and understand how I can achieve the greatest quality in my prints. Crazy that wasn't obvious to you, and even crazier you call the pursuit of quality gay.
Second I have been explaining and showing you that details that essentially max out the resolution of the lens do not matter because you can't even see them on an 8x10 contact print. Those hairs are less than a tenth of a millimeter wide. The magnified image wasn't to show you how in focus it was, obviously. It was to give you perspective on the scale of what you're naively calling a flaw in the print.
The print looks incredibly detailed in person, and the back of the head being slightly blurry makes absolutely no difference in that fact. It isn't even a distraction in the final image. Everything that would be a distraction if it was oof is in focus because I have experience with this type of work, unlike you. The thing you call a skill issue is actually the exact opposite.
Does that all make sense or do I need to dumb it down even further for you, my silly guy.
