>>4356106>"Reliable" is the go-to claim for dipshits who buy underperforming products.reliability of a product directly reflects the physical quality the product overall and materials used to make/create the product.
im fliping houses and doing real estate small jobs and do photography on the side. the amount of normie egotistic snobs and stuck up retards who live in their own bubbles that i know, have met or am friends with, is more than i can count... they all jerk off to premium products; premium brand clothes, premium brand cars, premium brand tech, they even fucking buy the most expensive foods, fruits and drinks because in their brain its like; expensive = good... and also expensive = status... which is only true if you're retarded. if you have an IQ even a point above 95, you will look for reliability before all else.
thats why i drive a toyota and a lexus. bought a then brand new Yaris back in 2002. now, 22 years later; 0 problems, 0 mechanics visits, only change oil, filters, tires, coolant and windshield wipers. in 22 years that i had the car, nothing and i mean nothing ever failed and/or had to be fixed. in 2011 i bought a used LS430... same story. 0 problems, 0 mechanics visits, only change oil, filters, tires, coolant and wipers and the car just goes and goes and goes...
same with my cameras; its why i use only nikon for decades now and not once have i had a problem. also nikon makes some of the best glass on the market, they were always head to head with leica and zeiss so i dont have to be sceptical in that department either when buying new nikon glass. its just quality and reliability of it... never failed me physically, never had any software issues, never had a nikon camera brick my SD card... in short, just overall 0 problems with nikon. (cant say the same for my brand new a1 or r5 that i had for less than 5 months each before major issues...)
thats also why i only shop in stores that source their clothing materials from jp, tur, sk etc...
