>>4359247That really doesn't matter except for circle of confusion sharp focus nonsense. What people really want in bokeh is smooth falloff and less clinical rendering which has less to do with "EQUIVVER LENTS" and more to do with lens design and *dramatic* format size differences (ie: 35mm vs... 6x9) allowing the use of more telephoto, less corrected glass.
overall this camera costs thousands and thousands but isn't much better than a much cheaper fujifilm XE4 with a 23mm f2. for you, it may even be worse, because its bigger. if you pixel peep the noise or red/blue textures fuji is a bit worse, but if that's your thing there's always the sony a7c and basically any lens in the same FOV range made by one of the 100 people that make sony lenses. fuck, even micro four thirds will probably be good enough for your cat.
it does not even look like a real leica and its fixed lens, what's the point when leicas are all about pretending to be famous leica users and being able to use leica mount lenses natively? IIRC 90% the point of owning an M mount body was that leica corrected their digital sensors cover glass for wide angles that were designed for film, and suffered color shifts and shit with thicker digital sensor cover glass.
>>4359263All equivalence also goes out the window if any sensor metrics are different. More or less electronic noise, megapixels, different features, etc. It becomes too full of "then, BUT IF....! ACKSHUALLY..." to be worth arguing about almost immediately. As a subject it is a waste of time for autists that like spreadsheets and literally jerk off to their gear. Any actual photographer who gets bored and takes a short lived interest in how camera technology actually works for trying to take a photo of something in space or scanning their film or something will eventually figure this out. Some crop sensors are actually BETTER than larger sensors and some larger sensors are BETTER than some crop sensors even "at eqevverlents" at worse.
