>>4358571Posting the man who thought he couldn't take a nice photo of a rock without a big ass 4x5 and still coped his way down to hasselblads and contaxes for portraiture because focusing took too long on it?
>SKILL ISSUE SKILL ISSUE STOP HAVING NICE THINGS!Technology limits your content. This is a fact of photography unless you can see the future and train your brain to do distance calculations as well as a computer. Also, you're a nophoto.
>>4358576>Near instant focus - on one spot with no tracking>vs every GOOD camera made since 2005: constant instant near-perfect tracking autofocus Yes, you have to prefocus and use deep DOF to cope with the fact that you'll probably miss otherwise
Or you could fast forward to the high technology of 1995 and just point and click and worry about composition, content, light, and color instead of reaction times like...
Literally everyone else, including every single award winning photographer who didn't go the "zone focus <50mm" route instead.
Also, you're nophoto. You're an internet tough guy who thinks his hylic computer-brain skills like leveling horizons without an onscreen level and "reaction times" are worth enough to make him good despite his total lack of composition, content, light, color, compelling stories, and emotion.
