>>4360853What kind of fucking idiot thinks AI improves photos
>Wow, the grain is totally gone! its so sharp!>plastic and smears.jpgEvery innovation in real camera tech is about less and less reliance on AI. More megapixels and sharper lenses for REAL details, not AI inpainted details from a probability engine guessing what each object is meant to be. Larger sensors for REAL noiseless images, not AI smoothing out the noise and painting in the details it thinks should go there. Cryptographic signing for more certainty that photos are not AI enhanced.
>But normal people don't notice or care about things being realThe controlling classes of our society two terms for "normal people" (IQ 85-100)
"Consumers" (figuratively "mindless cattle")
"A sucker born every minute" (figuratively "mindless cattle")
They hate you. They see you as lesser forms of life. They buy up every house to charge you $3k+ in rent if you want to live somewhere so they can be in a better position when they up your hours and leave your pay be. They have used their friends in insurance companies to manipulate the healthcare system and fill it with so much administrative bloat that you can't get a broken bone set or buy life saving medication without paying 1000% extra to the benefit of the shareholders. This is not a conspiracy theory. Corporate america is quite real.
While you're bitching about the newest snoy not having automatic AI HDR and AI skin enhancement with AI noise reduction and sharpening built in, things like cryptographic signing to verify a chain of custody and a lack of editing without state-level resources are being artificially limited to professional journalists who are members of specific state-associated organizations.
So, when your "much better" AI enhanced phone camera catches a soldier stabbing an anti-trump protester 80 times or records a pharma executive admitting to foul play your AI generated footage will be worthless and you're a russian propagnadist.
