>>4362650>It only outperforms an a7iii by 2fps- 20 vs 10 fps with e-shutter.
- R6 has much better AF, especially continuous AF in low light (the A7iii stopped down AF problem).
- R6 has deeper buffers.
- 8 stop IBIS vs 5 stop IBIS.
- Much better high ISO. The R6 is roughly one full stop cleaner at the highest ISOs. Even at "lower" high ISOs like 12800 the R6 is cleaner. (The best FF high ISO bodies in the world right now are the original R6 and the A7s II, not III.)
- Let's not even talk about ergonomics or color.
>with a premium L lensTypical shill crap. Most lenses can keep up with the mech shutter.
>The sony a7iii can hit its 10fps with basically every lensThat's because the A7iii locks down the aperture which can cause it to lose focus due to the loss of light. I would rather have 8-10 in focus frames than 10 oof frames in low light.
>The mechanical limit of third party and older sony lenses is 15fps so I think canon is shitting people and using firmware restrictions to encourage buying L glass.I think you're a dumb shill since the list of lenses that can/cannot shoot 12 fps mech has nothing to do with L or not.
>I also would not put it past canon to use a firmware trick to cause third party batteries to fail faster. For some reason they have the most third party power supply problems.And to dig the shill hole deeper you just start making shit up.
>>4362653>and every canon's e shutter framerate figure also includes a forced drop to 12 bit raws (2 less stops of dynamic range)No, not every single one, but this is true for the R6.
>... and no one is 100% sure if canons faster sensors had the whole 2 stops to loseMore obvious shill bullshit. You're a terrible liar.
>MUH NR!!!Doesn't affect detail, only applied at low ISO. And truth be told, everyone is doing something similar with their RAW files, it's just a question of whether or not PtP detects it.
Now let's talk about Snoy star eating high ISO NR, which DOES affect detail...
