[4 / 1 / ?]
Quoted By:
I like Raw Therapee but the pain it puts me through to make local adjustments has singlehandedly ruined the process of making finer edits.
Pic related is just one of hundreds of threads that go something like this.
> Person a) Hey why is masking such a pain in the ass? Lightroom and photoshop do it in a few clicks. Instead I have to fiddle with this shape detection algorithm for 5 hours and the results aren't even that good. Also I can't even use exposure compensation on local adjustments..?
> Person b) brushes, lasso tools and subject detection are all tools of the cavemen >:(
I get that this program is made possible by volunteers who do great work for nothing - big thanks to them. But the idea of deliberately avoiding the user-friendly masking methods used in other software *and then* calling that a feature, sounds like cope.
I don't want to enable the AI-data-scraping machine that is Adobe, so is there any alternative with comparable masking tools?
Pic related is just one of hundreds of threads that go something like this.
> Person a) Hey why is masking such a pain in the ass? Lightroom and photoshop do it in a few clicks. Instead I have to fiddle with this shape detection algorithm for 5 hours and the results aren't even that good. Also I can't even use exposure compensation on local adjustments..?
> Person b) brushes, lasso tools and subject detection are all tools of the cavemen >:(
I get that this program is made possible by volunteers who do great work for nothing - big thanks to them. But the idea of deliberately avoiding the user-friendly masking methods used in other software *and then* calling that a feature, sounds like cope.
I don't want to enable the AI-data-scraping machine that is Adobe, so is there any alternative with comparable masking tools?
