[102 / 30 / ?]
646KiB, 1592x1080, Screenshot_2024-09-12-06-52-21-99_e2d5b3f32b79de1d45acd1fad96fbb0f.jpg
Quoted By: >>4364170 >>4364182 >>4364191 >>4364198 >>4364221 >>4364222 >>4364254 >>4364320 >>4364348 >>4364450 >>4364829 >>4364875 >>4365145 >>4371349 >>4371582
This board should be /gf/ - Gear Fagging, not /p/.
What will your cope be when software and AI upscaling/rendering on phones catch up to pro bodies? A phone snapshit from a clueless stacy already looks better than a snapshit from a clueless /p/ poster.
You can even throw a filter on a phone snap and make it look like film at a glance.
AI jpeg processing in phone will destroy the need for pro bodies within a few years. How will /p/ standout?
I wish this board was discussing composition, lighting, techniques, etc...
Photographers using grainy, early-gen film and lenses full of imperfections were producing timeless photographs 100 years ago. /P/ takes uninspired and uncomposed photos with bodies that cost as much as a used car.
Not saying that Im a good photographer or anything, but it'd be nice to come here for inspo instead of purchase guides.
What will your cope be when software and AI upscaling/rendering on phones catch up to pro bodies? A phone snapshit from a clueless stacy already looks better than a snapshit from a clueless /p/ poster.
You can even throw a filter on a phone snap and make it look like film at a glance.
AI jpeg processing in phone will destroy the need for pro bodies within a few years. How will /p/ standout?
I wish this board was discussing composition, lighting, techniques, etc...
Photographers using grainy, early-gen film and lenses full of imperfections were producing timeless photographs 100 years ago. /P/ takes uninspired and uncomposed photos with bodies that cost as much as a used car.
Not saying that Im a good photographer or anything, but it'd be nice to come here for inspo instead of purchase guides.
