>>4367775Sony lenses are really, really good, easily the best in full frame, but despite being "THE associated press camera" they're not really focusing on what a journo snapshitter would want (range and speed). Canon and tamron (which is mostly owned by sony) are.
Sony is too busy making lenses that come very close to arri signature primes to make a 24-105 f2.8 apparently. And if you're not going to zoom in 200% on an a7rv, do you truly need the budget version of an arri sig?
The only people i've seen contest this have been nikon fanboys rambling about microcontrast and other made up metrics
