>>4368794>I was talking specifically about the A7Riv and v...
>I'm thinking of picking up an a7iv or a7cii myself with a 20-70 f4, and keeping a micro four thirds around for the pocket camera/telezoom camera role.yeah I don't care about your gay no mans land megapixel cameras, 62mp sony is the new 36mp nikon, a very gay cope number associated with noisier cameras than the surrounding product tiers, except the higher product tier is a fujifilm. Wanker cameras.
>>4368799It's the power of keeping your camera alive. It's even in the IP rating that water gets in. How good it is basically depends on how much water can pool and where it runs after hitting the areas that get the most exposure, because all of the seals will crap out immediately or eventually.
I would take an e-m1iii into rain before an e-m5iii, and any DSLR over any mirrorless, specifically because of the proven assumption that weather sealing doesn't really do anything except slow the inevitable and a little space inside helps more than all the seam rubber that is rendered moot as soon as you use any controls. The larger the camera, the better protected the critical components should be (except canon shoves everything expensive to the rear so you should definitely not let water pool on the back of the camera like that retard from reddit). The smaller the camera, the more you should treat it like its pricetag implies you should.
@4368810
@4368808
Shut the fuck up clive, actual people are talking about getting cameras to use instead of brands to fanboy.
