>>4371364>filter for bw on a 2000s digicamthanks anon but you're kinda missing the point of the picture. there was no detail in the bright area which would improve the picture. i wanted to capture the jarring transition from dark underground to light above world. the specifics of the above world are irrelevant. what matters is exactly what i emphasize here literally: its stark, blinding contrast to the dark i was exiting. anyways most of my street at 35mm is on film and most of my street on digital is at 28mm so i didn't have many shots to pick from, but this is all beside the point of my post which was that OP needs to be more specific to get anything but the broadest answers
>>4371625who cares about the intent of literally anything up to the print. whatever led them to the images, they published the final results on purpose. nice pic btw
