Why is it whenever I'm not on /p/, I don't see one iota of this non-stop sony hate, but when I'm on /p/ its the first thing I see.
IRL these are pretty well liked cameras, on /p/ and /p/ only its
ALWAYS A FUCKING PANASONIC REVIEWER
And a clear white balance error (look at the color temperature of her WHITE shirt - if you've edited a raw before you can see what's actually going on)
I have a feeling that /p/ actually has an autistic panasonic shill on it. It's the same fucktard that always posts "its over for snoy" every panaSHIT release. I'm sorry kid but PANASONIC IS UNUSABLE TRASH.
Buy a fucking Nikon. Panasonic us unusable garbage. The only brand that can exceed's sonys performance, colors, rendering, etc is Nikon. Period. Sony cameras are great, better than what canon offers except for talentless retards (ie: videographers and FPS freaks) but Nikon's are significantly better.
>>4374764Resolution baws.
Digital cameras have limited resolution, called the nyquist limit, prior to which they generate max contrast and sharpness. All of the lenses outresolve the sensors, so they generate false detail/false color at and below the nyquist limit due to bayer's retardation. Proprietary raw processors cook some sharpening and NR into files even if you think they're off because you dropped the sliders to 0, which makes things look a little weird after software auto-corrects flaws.
Foveon is less prone to this but will still look like pixel art and get moire somtimes.
Film's resolution works differently and is in excess of digital. Film has more resolution, way more, but the finer the details get, the less ACUTANCE aka "sharpness" (clean edges) it has. This is actually similar to how your eyes perceive reality so it looks less unnatural. But to photographers, this is what makes film worse because its less "sharp" when pixel peeping.
