>>4379266What don't you understand about DYNAMIC RANGE IS ABOUT SENSOR TECH, NOT FUCKING SENSOR SIZE, full faggot?
Canon's sensor tech and DR is inferior, so it has the same DR as micro four thirds. Sensor size is only photon shot noise. In theory it's a cap on how much DR can be achieved but the G9II has 2 stops of DR over most other micro four thirds cameras because it has a base ISO of 100 and simultaneous dual gain reaodut.
Please remember, many professional cinema cameras have 18 stops of DR with APS-C sensors, while full faggots are lucky to get 14.5 stops with the most permissive cutoffs.
Sharpness doesn't have jack shit do with sensor size either. If your lens can't keep up with a finer pixel pitch, that's your poorfag lenses problem.
Also please remember:
The only companies with new full frame cameras that have normal full frame DR are Panasonic and Nikon.
Nikon's new camera with normal full frame DR: The ZF
Panasonic cameras with normal full frame DR: S1R, S5II, S5IIX
Sony has less DR than it used to - the A7IV and A7RV have noisier sensors than the A7III and A7RIII.
Canon has barely any DR as they always have.
Photons to photos charts measure photon shot noise, not dynamic range. Photon shot noise is irrelevant. It's a software processing issue and most full faggots shoot at equivalent ISOs most of the time anyways.
