/p/ - Photography » Thread #4382756

[90 / 7 / 1]

490KiB, 2500x2500, panasonic_dc_gh6lk_lumix_gh6_mirrorless_camera_1690092-3790362369(1).jpg

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 09:18:23 No.4382756 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4382761 >>4382762 >>4382769 >>4382775 >>4382829 >>4382834 >>4382863 >>4383114 >>4383150 >>4383172 >>4383697 >>4384925 >>4385179 >>4386211

GH5ii, GH6, GH7, G9ii?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 09:22:55 No.4382758 Report

Quoted By:

Perhaps

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 09:29:43 No.4382761 Report

Quoted By: >>4383695

>>4382756
Sony a6700 if you want to have beautiful colours

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 09:37:53 No.4382762 Report

Quoted By: >>4382828

>>4382756
even a $200 canon 5d will outperform any of these

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 11:03:33 No.4382769 Report

Quoted By: >>4382771

>>4382756
GH7 because it has the biggest number

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 11:13:21 No.4382771 Report

Quoted By: >>4382785

>>4382769
But its expensive though

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 11:45:59 No.4382775 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382756
none, go full frame

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO gh8.jpg, 387KiB, 1600x1060

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 12:12:11 No.4382778 Report

Quoted By:

GH8

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 12:32:33 No.4382785 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382771
I cannot actually, in good conscience, recommend any MFT setup that costs more than maybe $500. The entire reason for the system to exist is basically replaced by modern mirrorless APS-C. There are outliying reasons, but (You) are likely not one of them.

(You) should buy the Canon 5DIII or IV and
a. save yourself a bunch of money
b. give yourself far better results than MFT could ever hope for

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 12:55:59 No.4382789 Report

Quoted By:

There is a gear thread, you nunce.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 14:57:17 No.4382806 Report

Quoted By: >>4382824

If you are going to use native lenses, go for one with working AF. If not, the original gh5.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 15:47:28 No.4382824 Report

Quoted By: >>4382848

>>4382806
So vintage -> gh5

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 15:57:27 No.4382828 Report

Quoted By: >>4384257

>>4382762
Lol not in dynamic range or video

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 16:08:28 No.4382829 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382756
Probably just a cell phone, bro.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 16:18:43 No.4382834 Report

Quoted By: >>4382836 >>4382842 >>4383739

>>4382756
>spending real camera money on an inferior format and dead system
>ff sized bodies, phone sized sensors, subfuji autofocus and awful build quality
Why?
Canon r7 or sony a6700, preferably canon r7
You actually NEED video specs = go shop blackmagicdesign not hybrid vlogslop. Mft is not even a good mount. Most “ok” lenses cost as much as better lenses on ff so you will adapt ef and get worse everything. only excuse is being a literal bitch and having such weak arms you think f8-11 zooms are excusable.

I can not in good conscience recommend an mft setup over $1k (body, several lenses, and flash) unless you have a medical condition (ie: only having one arm) and will kill yourself if you cant take shitty photos of birds and bugs anymore. Maybe if your medical condition is aspergers syndrome. I notice a lot of the happier mft shills on youtube are really dysgenic looking and hyperfocus on things that dont matter irl but fulfill completionist and ocd like desires, ie: 4k60/120 crop factors (usually a quality niggle but its already cropped 2x so its just aspergers) when they dont shoot professionally anyways. Honestly the 4k looks like 1080p so whats the point? The rest are recently divorced and miserable looking.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 16:25:53 No.4382836 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382834
video spergs like that are the same as ff fags that think they need 61+ megapixels

ok 24 and 45 i can see, 8k screens soon, but how deep are these idiots cropping, and mft video is worse because the 4k actually does look like 1080p

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 16:53:59 No.4382842 Report

Quoted By: >>4382843

>>4382834
Jesus christ, YOU need to KILL YOURSELF

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 16:58:57 No.4382843 Report

Quoted By: >>4382844

>>4382842
Truth hurt? Micro four thirds is legit pointless if you’re going to spend that much and aren’t physically disabled or cripplingly “neurodivergent”

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 17:04:45 No.4382844 Report

Quoted By: >>4382854 >>4383162

>>4382843
You're crippling abomination sharted out of your whoring mother's womb. If trump didn't delegalise abortions, she would cut a parasite like you aeons ago and forget that something so insufferable and disgusting ever existed. Take a shot and remove yourself from this earth and make the place for much more useful people than YOU.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 17:15:52 No.4382848 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382824
I'd say so, if buying second hand is fine, there is nothing that motivates paying much more for one of the newer cams. I had my gh5 out the the other day to test a c-mount lens I picked up, and it's still a beast. Can't be beat for what they are going for now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 17:34:37 No.4382854 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382844
This is how the panjeetsonic shill brigade reacts to reality. You indian guys sure dont know how to write an insult. You always end up sounding like a bollywood villain.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2024 17:56:37 No.4382863 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382756
None.

The canon R7 is really good. Far better than anything on micro four thirds unless you're a huge macro autist. The a6700 has more dynamic range and less features if you want a compact. If you don't give a fuck about the size of telephoto and macro lenses (as an alternative to going m43 and not giving a fuck about ugly ass nervous bokeh and diffraction blur), put in a few extra shifts at your mcjob and buy an R6II (pro camera, great video) or 1st gen A7C (good enough for you if you're not getting paid).

These panashit things are just meme camcorders for autistic people that focus on spec sheets and get too wrapped up in codecs to realize everything coming out of the camera just looks bad, period.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Nov 2024 07:46:10 No.4383114 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382756
A6700. I have an A6500, G9, and G9ii. Sony colors are better and that's coming from the crappier older Sony color rendition. A6500 has a lot of annoying things like cropping in higher than 24fps and noticeable rolling shutter which the A6700 fixes.

If you really need the better stabilization, get a gimbal. I hate gimbals so it's the G9ii for me most of the time but get the GH7 if you are doing a lot of video and really want MFT Panasonic. GH5ii, GH6 have garbage AF like the G9. Avoid. FF is also worth a look at these price ranges. If I were starting over, I'd go either R6ii or ZV-E1 and focus on stationary footage which is more pleasant anyway than walking shots.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Color_Science.jpg, 883KiB, 1955x1095

Anonymous Sat 09 Nov 2024 08:37:16 No.4383128 Report

Quoted By: >>4383169

>snoy colors are goo-

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Nov 2024 12:07:22 No.4383150 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382756
S1/5 original

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Nov 2024 14:42:01 No.4383162 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382844
>SAAR

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Nov 2024 15:36:21 No.4383169 Report

Quoted By: >>4383170

>>4383128
Did she fuck up the white balance on purpose? In capture one the 2020+snoys with the prostandard profile look exactly like nikon and the s5.
The s9 is so shit it’s sent panashills reeling with olympus levels of shill desperation. For once, a camera that is OBJECTIVELY unusable for most photography. No shutter or hot shoe lmfao.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Nov 2024 15:39:29 No.4383170 Report

Quoted By:

>>4383169
and its bigger than the a7c. lol. another awful product from a literal washing machine company. why would they know how to design a camera, rather than an appliance designed to screw people out of their money?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_0736.jpg, 114KiB, 1280x720

Anonymous Sat 09 Nov 2024 15:48:06 No.4383172 Report

Quoted By: >>4383177 >>4383189

>>4382756
dont buy a panasonic op.
https://watermanatwork.com/blog/panasonic-lumix-cameras-fail/
even a canon r50 is better but definitely yeah get an r7. canon is awesome.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Nov 2024 16:02:34 No.4383177 Report

Quoted By: >>4383179

>>4383172
Sony should sue Panasonic, clearly stolen tech

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Nov 2024 16:18:23 No.4383179 Report

Quoted By:

>>4383177
Even an old snoy is not as unreliable as a penisonic. Not even fuji is that bad. But they’re close.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Nov 2024 16:40:07 No.4383189 Report

Quoted By: >>4383195

>>4383172
>article from 2017

As if nothing would change in 7 years. Seethe more.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Nov 2024 16:48:58 No.4383195 Report

Quoted By: >>4383262

>>4383189
>no it’s old
snoy levels of cope. panasonics quality has never improved.
>be s5ii
>drain battery when off
>be g9ii…
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4742890
https://www.reddit.com/r/Lumix/comments/1g1zuk8/has_anyone_else_noticed_this_audio_issue_with_the/?rdt=49703
https://www.reddit.com/r/Lumix/comments/1cx1wkp/g9_ii_fried_my_memory_cards_help_needed/
Avoid penisonic. Buy a canon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Nov 2024 20:41:16 No.4383262 Report

Quoted By: >>4383350 >>4383367

>>4383195
Stop cherry picking shill, OP is clearly looking for a video cam and G9ii is not the one they should get. GH5s is the one they should get if it's mft, and FF it's any of the newer bodies. I've never had issues with any lumix (or any canon for that behalf).

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 01:04:54 No.4383350 Report

Quoted By: >>4383457

>>4383262
GH5s has no IBIS and shitty DFD unlike G9ii and GH7.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 02:40:32 No.4383367 Report

Quoted By: >>4383457

>>4383262
>gh5s
Still breaks because its a penisonic. Also lol 4k looks like 1080p. No autofocus. No good lenses without a janky adapter or a snoy gm budget. Just the corner wobbling meme stabilizer.

Get a real video camera like a canon r8/r7

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 03:53:21 No.4383384 Report

Quoted By: >>4383405

GH5S has no IBIS because it was intended to be rigged, and they found that the GH5 still had wobble even when the IBIS was disabled.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 04:40:37 No.4383405 Report

Quoted By: >>4383406

>>4383384
>rigging a micro four turds camera
is this the ultimate "I'm a film maker" larp?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 04:47:03 No.4383406 Report

Quoted By: >>4383445

>>4383405
No, currently that's shooting on 8mm film.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 07:45:47 No.4383445 Report

Quoted By: >>4383497

>>4383406
Shooting on 8mm film is actual film making. Anything shot on digital is taking video and all the cope in the world can't change that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 09:01:48 No.4383457 Report

Quoted By: >>4383527 >>4383599

>>4383350
That's intentional
>>4383367
>b-b-but panasonic is hecking bad quality
>only argument is to call it "penisonic" as if that's somehow a bad thing
>calls canon r7/r8 "real" video cameras

lol. lmao even. are they paying you to do this?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 12:39:25 No.4383497 Report

Quoted By: >>4383599

>>4383445
How soon until I can buy an Arri for vacation vids?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 16:03:21 No.4383527 Report

Quoted By: >>4383559 >>4384252

>>4383457
>panasonic is bad quality
Correct.
>old!
The s5ii and g9ii aren’t old. Panasonic has a consistent problem with quality in cameras. Why would they spend extra on qc for a dying division? They’re not even selling cameras with shutters or hot shoes anymore lmao. You are being scammed.
>cherry picked!
The same shit is damning to sony with the same number of problems spread across 4x more cameras and most of theirs are “old” (2017) too. They get shit solely because canon and nikon cameras dont break period and havent since early DSLRs. The only problem is nikon cant make autofocus work, so buy a canon. The only real option in mirrorless.

Ah, and yes, sony is meant to be a professional brand and penisonic isnt. Higher standards.

Panasonic is subsnoy and has a green tint.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Lumix/comments/1c1k8b2/very_disappointed_with_s5iix_color_science_and_iq/
Buy canon for a problem free experience.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 16:52:06 No.4383559 Report

Quoted By: >>4383564

>>4383527
How much are they paying you for this?

Just so you know, there is no "green tint" on Lumix cameras. It's a magenta tint. The reddit thread was made by a retard, and you are retarded for not reading the comments.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 16:55:09 No.4383564 Report

Quoted By: >>4383583

>>4383559
>umm the color science is bad in a different way mmmmmay?
You sound like a snoy. “Noooo you didnt set your white balance right its not green its actually a piss filter and needs to be 4800k in daylight!”
Canon color science has no tint fyi.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 17:24:24 No.4383583 Report

Quoted By:

>>4383564
Bad? Who said anything about bad.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 18:47:30 No.4383599 Report

Quoted By: >>4386213

>>4383497
You buy an old 8mm camera which is what people used for vacations before junk video came onto the scene.

>>4383457
GH5s is intentionally shit, we know.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 19:13:38 No.4383602 Report

Quoted By:

Fuji >>>> panasonic

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Nov 2024 22:00:06 No.4383651 Report

Quoted By: >>4383696

Wait, the MFT haters is all one guy? huh

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 11 Nov 2024 00:06:21 No.4383695 Report

Quoted By: >>4383718

>>4382761
>snoy
>colors
lmao

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 11 Nov 2024 00:08:17 No.4383696 Report

Quoted By:

>>4383651
yeah

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 11 Nov 2024 00:09:20 No.4383697 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382756
for unlimited video recording GH7, if you don't need unlimited video recording the G9II.
fantastic camera

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 11 Nov 2024 01:21:14 No.4383718 Report

Quoted By: >>4383738

>>4383695
Sony has the best color science
>inb4 the fat girl with fudged white balance

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 11 Nov 2024 03:12:54 No.4383738 Report

Quoted By:

>>4383718
Unironically true

a7iv and a7c colors are lovely

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 11 Nov 2024 03:15:37 No.4383739 Report

Quoted By: >>4384224 >>4384241

>>4382834
this post unironically made me get the lumix s5iix instead of the gh7

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 12 Nov 2024 02:17:15 No.4384224 Report

Quoted By:

>>4383739
shoulda got a canon

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 12 Nov 2024 04:02:27 No.4384241 Report

Quoted By: >>4384252

>>4383739
shoulda got a sony zve1

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO snoy color science.jpg, 221KiB, 1566x944

Anonymous Tue 12 Nov 2024 04:27:06 No.4384252 Report

Quoted By: >>4384255 >>4384265

>>4384241
>>4383527
Daily reminder

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 12 Nov 2024 04:47:54 No.4384255 Report

Quoted By: >>4384256

>>4384252
right: filmic sovl
left: sovlless

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 12 Nov 2024 04:52:23 No.4384256 Report

Quoted By: >>4384260

>>4384255
nothing filmic in either of them

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 12 Nov 2024 04:53:50 No.4384257 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382828
Micro four thirds has no dynamic range. Just noise.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 12 Nov 2024 04:57:25 No.4384260 Report

Quoted By: >>4384263

>>4384256
can't help but notice you don't deny the sovl

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 12 Nov 2024 05:24:38 No.4384263 Report

Quoted By:

>>4384260
digital is by definition soulless

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 12 Nov 2024 05:50:23 No.4384265 Report

Quoted By:

>>4384252
Its just no sun+different white balance

Are panasonic shills this desperate

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Untitled.png, 2MiB, 1125x1174

Anonymous Wed 13 Nov 2024 04:33:23 No.4384711 Report

Quoted By: >>4384713

Guess the AA filter direction (or if it doesn't exist)

If your camera has an AA filter you are being scammed. Moire reduction in post works great, looks better, and is quick and easy to do.
>inb4 EDITING!?
Shooting jpeg is for consumer/hobby cameras, not professional equipment. People shoot jpeg on fujifilm, not professional canon/sony bodies. They only put AA filters on because it makes the camera worse than the next more expensive model. You still get moire too because the AA filter only blurs in one direction, and almost no moire generating patterns do! You have to edit anyways!

They just want you to buy the 40+ megapixel cameras that are "more professional". if you didn't have an AA filter, you would be too happy with how sharp and professional your photos looked.

>BUT MY CANON SONY NIKON HAS BETTER AUTOFOCUS AND SHARPER/SMALLER LENSES
So? Your photos are blurry at the sensor level.

If you are a professional and need to deliver the sharpest photos, only a panasonic will actually do it with 24 megapixels.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 13 Nov 2024 04:43:52 No.4384713 Report

Quoted By: >>4384714

>>4384711
It doesnt matter because no one pixel peeps distant photos of ultra fine pencil art.

In prints noticeably blurred photos can be sharp. Go learn a lost photographers art: circle of confusion, print size, and viewing distance. Dpreview test pages are like printing 24mp 7 feet wide. When was the last time you did that? As always panasonic fans focus on the least relevant shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 13 Nov 2024 04:45:54 No.4384714 Report

Quoted By: >>4384718

>>4384713
Cope harder, quality is quality

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 13 Nov 2024 04:53:04 No.4384718 Report

Quoted By:

>>4384714
>quality is quality
>1px level detail is better in one direction
>have to pixel peep to see
>huge moire patterns visible even in a tiny crop
>dont have to pixel peep to see
If you gave a fuck you’d stop being poor and buy a camera with more megapixels. Professionals literally ask companies to keep the AA filters on because no one who prints big enough to see the sharpness would settle for 24mp bayer. I can not tell real world z6ii and s5ii photos apart besides panasonic having duller colors overall and less accurate reds.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 13 Nov 2024 12:39:52 No.4384805 Report

Quoted By: >>4384907 >>4384916 >>4384930 >>4386212 >>4386379

my piggies, is the G9 MK1 actually still a good buy? for stills mostly, don't care about le video

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 13 Nov 2024 20:00:55 No.4384907 Report

Quoted By:

>>4384805
It could, but that depends on the price.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 13 Nov 2024 20:37:21 No.4384916 Report

Quoted By:

>>4384805
The G9 fails at fast action due to unreliable AFC, which is a shame because it has so many other features relating to fast action. Other than that specific use I fully recommend it, especially for $500 as it's going for nowadays.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 13 Nov 2024 20:54:27 No.4384925 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382756
S1 or S5 if you don't need AF, S5ii or S5iix if you do.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 13 Nov 2024 21:19:28 No.4384930 Report

Quoted By:

>>4384805
No. Buy a used FF DSLR or APSC mirrorless.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 14 Nov 2024 15:47:36 No.4385179 Report

Quoted By: >>4385186

>>4382756
>S5

why are you not considering an s5 or s5ii? b&h had a crazy deal on the s5ii x with a 50mm a few months back. maybe the still do. like $1500. and the 50mm is a great lens.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 14 Nov 2024 16:38:10 No.4385186 Report

Quoted By: >>4385187 >>4385188

>>4385179
>sir, panasonic is good sir. buy new on sale at b&h now my sirs. l mount to the moon brahma willing!
This post is an ad

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 14 Nov 2024 16:40:22 No.4385187 Report

Quoted By: >>4385190 >>4385196

>>4385186
OP asked about 4 PANASONIC cameras
>gets recommended another Panasonic camera not listed
>It's a conspiracy!

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 14 Nov 2024 16:46:31 No.4385188 Report

Quoted By:

>>4385186
You are probably right. Sony, Nikon,
Canon, and Fuji users almost always recommend buying used cameras because the savings amount to a lens or more, except for the one actual paid canon shill who pops up to direct us to canon’s refurb page and insist that the r50 is a good camera (lol just get a ff dslr).

Meanwhile 9/10 panasonic recommendations on /p/ that are not a dated decade old point and shoot are instructions to buy a new camera bundled with a new lens off amazon or something. And this board has maybe 2 panasonic users (too much, given the ass autofocus and unreliability, but they’re probably from /vid/)

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 14 Nov 2024 16:47:55 No.4385190 Report

Quoted By: >>4385206

>>4385187
No, OP asked about video oriented micro four thirds cameras, rajesh. Go shill S5 ON SALE NOW somewhere else. We like cameras that don’t eat their batteries while off here. Also working autofocus and lens ecosystems that dont suck.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 14 Nov 2024 17:11:33 No.4385196 Report

Quoted By: >>4385206

>>4385187
And all of them are micro four thirds, not the ff garbage
>l mount so worthless its sole purpose is adapting canon lenses
>s5ii drains battery while off
>404: autofocus not found
The mft cameras at least have some advantage (cheaper with slightly smaller lenses). Panasonic FF cameras are just worse nikons.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 14 Nov 2024 17:59:58 No.4385206 Report

Quoted By: >>4385210

>>4385190
>>4385196
hoes mad
S5ii is a great camera, even better with DJI's Lidar AF system

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO file.png, 725KiB, 1141x1491

Anonymous Thu 14 Nov 2024 18:05:39 No.4385210 Report

Quoted By: >>4385213

>>4385206
>buying external autofocus because your camera's autofocus isn't good
and the battery drain doesn't matter, because you converted it to V mount batteries, right? no need to worry about shutter failures either because shutters dont wear out shooting video :^)

but OP was asking about micro four thirds, not about spending thousands rigging out a worse nikon z6ii with a desolate lens mount

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 14 Nov 2024 18:07:49 No.4385213 Report

Quoted By: >>4385216

>>4385210
Thanks for confirming you don't understand the purpose Lidar AF

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 14 Nov 2024 18:39:39 No.4385216 Report

Quoted By:

>>4385213
>panasois need lidar on manual focus lenses because native l mount sucks
lol no wonder everyone is buying the zv1

manual “cine” lenses are not special, most of them are sterile and modern actually

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Nov 2024 12:45:15 No.4386211 Report

Quoted By:

>>4382756
i assume theres other anons here that actually work on videography, but i do aswell
you should go gh7 or g9ii
i think panasonic is the best when it comes to average-work videographer
has ibis, decent autofocus on newer camera models, good batterylife, leica glass (or any other if ur ok with manual focus) shoots really good internal codecs and formats, possible to upgrade to external recorders whenever u want instead of having to buy a new camera
can be found as low as 900 in the used market
if you do more profesional or higher level work look onto blackmagic

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Nov 2024 12:47:57 No.4386212 Report

Quoted By: >>4386221

>>4384805
if its solely for stills, unironically a canon 5d mk2 with old canon lenses
i dont know why anybody would go mft panasonic for photography when 5dmk2 can be found for like 250 dollars

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Nov 2024 12:50:08 No.4386213 Report

Quoted By:

>>4383599
gh5s is intended to be used the way a blackmagic should be, you know, with a crew of people doing different things

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Nov 2024 14:03:41 No.4386221 Report

Quoted By: >>4386225 >>4386230

>>4386212
>dslr
>mirror SLAP
>oh I overexposed
yeah no thanks, go back to your containment thread, luddite

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Nov 2024 14:41:41 No.4386225 Report

Quoted By:

>>4386221
why would you call me names
it has good ergonomics, takes very good pictures in raw format, many really good lens options, pictures probably as good as any ff photography camera released in recent years for dirt cheap
i dont know what the problem is

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Nov 2024 15:03:36 No.4386230 Report

Quoted By:

>>4386221
>Calls other guy luddite
>Shills for objectively worse technology
Not the win you were expecting homie. DSLRs were great for decades and the existence of inferior mirrorless tech doesn't make them somehow worse at making good photos

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 19 Nov 2024 07:25:49 No.4386379 Report

Quoted By:

>>4384805
As long as you aren't shooting BIF you're fine, even then it's possible just not the right tool for the job. Whether or not it's a good buy depends on your requirements. M43 is a compromise in a lot of ways.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches