>>4384693Nikan't hasn't used a single bit of RED technology yet. Just because they own RED doesn't mean they have to put RED sensors in Nikon cameras. In fact, it's probably cost prohibitive to. Cinema cameras are very bespoke and the sensors for them are absurdly expensive. Either the camera would cost as much as a RED anyways, or they'd lose money selling it.
I strongly doubt they will stop using sony for consumer camera sensors this decade. There's a lot of stagnation but photographers have a baby boomer mentality where they would gladly pay for a brand new 1950s car every year.
>>4384644Slowly but surely. G mount is getting sports lenses now. There will come a time when the cameras most people consider not the best but good enough will just be lofi retro memes, just like all the small sensor point and shoots ken rockwell considered not the best but good enough. People who aren't into lofi retro will just see them as the bullshit they put up with until technology got better.
>b-b-but 50hp leaf spring suspended cars with no crash safety have "soul", ur a consoomer, heccin skill issue, #actualthingenjoyer #normiesout! 
