/p/ - Photography » Thread #4389297

[13 / 5 / 1]

208KiB, 392x412, Screenshot 2024-12-02 020428.png

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2024 07:11:06 No.4389297 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Anybody know what exact camera gear setup this guy is using?

Looks like a sony but unsure if FX3 or FX30 or A7CR etc

Either way, the video quality & audio for youtube blew the fuck out of the video quality that the Sony DSLR vlogger team faggots were using. (A7s3 or around there)

Video quality here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSiRv7Nek0c

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot 2024-12-02 022152.png, 196KiB, 383x438

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2024 07:23:52 No.4389298 Report

Quoted By:

Heres a sidephoto of the lens, looks like a wide aperture g master or sigma?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2024 11:41:41 No.4389337 Report

Quoted By: >>4389341 >>4389389 >>4390381

Looks like a tamron zoom because sigma zooms are more compact than that

A7cr comes in black so it's probably that

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2024 12:25:49 No.4389341 Report

Quoted By: >>4389366

>>4389337
have you seen the video quality? it looks like the FX30 as a minimum imo
This is marginally the lowest baseline I would ever want my videos to look desu so I really am interested in knowing the exact model

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2024 15:36:21 No.4389366 Report

Quoted By:

>>4389341
You can easily get that quality with an FX30

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2024 17:43:51 No.4389389 Report

Quoted By:

>>4389337
Why would anyone buy a 61mp snoy for an elaborate video kit

The rolling shutter is so bad, and its a lot of money for megapixels that video cant even use

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 18:25:41 No.4390370 Report

Quoted By:

Bump

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 19:13:36 No.4390381 Report

Quoted By:

>>4389337
>sigma zooms are more compact than tamron
L O L

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO .png, 61KiB, 134x293

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 19:38:25 No.4390383 Report

Quoted By: >>4390416

Sony lens at 5:03

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO .png, 282KiB, 636x416

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 19:39:26 No.4390384 Report

Quoted By: >>4390416

Aperture ring, so 24-70 gm2?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO .png, 206KiB, 355x354

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 19:42:20 No.4390385 Report

Quoted By: >>4390407 >>4390416

9:17, definitely not a FX or C cam. Standard A7 of some sort.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Dec 2024 23:16:55 No.4390407 Report

Quoted By: >>4390416

>>4390385
A7S III most likely, or possibly A7 IV you can see the hinge for the fully articulated screen and I think those are the only snoys with that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Dec 2024 00:22:08 No.4390416 Report

Quoted By:

>>4390383
>>4390384
>>4390385
>>4390407
Thanks bro, looks like I'mma be saving money and getting the A7S III not the FX3

Also in comparison, the Fishtank S2-S3 series were shot in FX3 rigs and they look decent but nothing to the quality of the A7SIII

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5llNYfI6IqY

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches