>>4390811Wrong
Anyone who ever wanted to paint or draw is an actual faggot if they are not just a wine aunt.
>oooh i am such a sensitive and thoughtful person i expressed myself by drawing a blue flower. now, time to do some furry porn. I like photography because I can record womens tits in exacting detail.
>>4390882Correct which is why photobooks are pretentious nonsense, countless "great" photographers are nepo baby hacks, and the only value in any of the pictures is purely historical. "A good photo of ____ fact/event".
If you like photography, like photography, not high on acid art where you call following a photo of a hobo with a photo of a semi truck an intersectional critique of climate privilege. The only art in any art is in doing it well, like artisan baking. Its just bread not a fucking cultural heirloom and even if you did paint because it seems more arty based on paintings being in museums you’d make yet-another, the mona lisa cool because its uncommon not because painting is special. One of the few good surviving paintings of an average looking woman. Having the only good photo of a historical event left after everyone elses are blurry or deleted is the same thing. Meaning in "art" (things done with a modicum of competence) is a farce. There is only novelty satiating your caveman hoarder brain and propaganda satiating the higher egos of the higher stations.
The old tiers of art said it best. The highest paintings were flattering portraits that endeared the rulers and the royal bloodline to the people and beautiful depictions of churchslop. No meaning just propaganda and novelty.
>but there IS-No, you have a mild manifestation of schizophrenia and notice patterns and meanings, often unpleasant ones, where they don’t exist. This is the real reason ashkenazi jews came to become overrepresented among artists and art critics, everyone is unkempt and antisocial, and there’s a dearth of peoples with lower schizo/‘tism rates.
