>>4394653>i look forward to seeing your photo threadgiving you a straightforward answer now
check the photos I quoted and give me an insightful feedback if you will, I'd truly appreciate that way more than debating mongolian basket weaving forum etiquette
this is a photography board
not a LARP boar, not a gear board, not a shitpost board, although yes, all of these are also a constituent part of the board
I didn't make a collage because it's a lot of work finding the respective photos in my folders and then collaging them all, only to get a shit image quality in the most boomer-aesthetic way
I select what I post, so quoting 30 or so images is not only way easier but also means I already selected them in a previous curatorial process, and they're available with one click with decent resolution
it's not pixel peeping
it's caring enough about what I do to have my photos in a presentable fashion
also
>instead of linking +20 that will disappear shortlywhy would I care if half a dozen of the photos I linked aren't available 3 months from now?
it's good enough if it's available until OP giver their feedback
or at least it would before you (yes, you) hijacked the thread derailing it with a nonsense take that can be summed as a stupid profiling based off of an absolutely superficial interaction (that was the joke I made in the other comment that went straight over Mr. Text Comprehension's head btw)
I'd be truly glad if you would offer criticism
Honestly
I'm way more interested in what you have to say about my photos than about me
