>>4396235>>4396236Okay first of all if you're going into film point and shoots expecting quality you're already retarded. If you're going into 35mm film at all expecting quality you're objectively 40 iq, so lets put that to bed. And I don't know point you think you're making about the plastic lenses as almost all plastic lens cameras are disposables, and the ones that aren't are mostly all broken anyway. Not that it matters because almost every point and shoot is plastic e-waste with a dogshit lens, yes the glass ones too. They were not made to last, and they weren't made for good image quality. The closest you're going to get to SLR image quality with a point and shoot is a TVS, and then you'll be spending 8x the price of an entry level SLR with an entry level lens, for ??? reason. They still take the same film, so they're not that much bigger, especially if you get a smaller one like an OM. If you can't carry an SLR you should kill yourself. This should have been on the stupid questions thread.
Also
>point and shoot>manual controlsWhat do you think point and shoot means retard?
