>>4403962Sony has the best color for an art photographer.
Canon and Nikon have great "commercial color science". They're inaccurate and intended to make people look better than they do. Skin gets brighter and more rosy when the real people look unhealthy, blotchy, and borderline gray skinned IRL. Shooting with a nikon in particular is fucking jarring. Everything that comes out of the camera looks more artificially vibrant than iphone pictures. You can shoot a flatly lit, boring, half dead tree on nikon and it comes out looking a lot more alive and this is impossible to fix without multiple selective color edits after 5 minutes of fucking with levels. Canon tones it down a little but there are a lot of obvious color shifts intended to make everyone rosy and a little tan even if they're pallid and gross as fuck. Their color science hides zits. Yes, it lessens the appearance of zits. 100% tuned for artificially even skin.
Sony transmits the color from reality into the camera body. On sony, if you want people with vibrant, bright, rosy skin, hire a model with good skin instead of a moderately overweight burger-fed zombie.
Now, let's say you're a wedding photographer
99/100 clients are overweight and subsist entirely off diet soda and ground beef...
Sony is the best art/hobby system in general, lots of portable gear and clearly designed to fit comfortably in airline carryons first and handhold the f2.8 profag trinity all day long second.
