>>4409736All cameras fuck up reds in different ways depending on the light source. All of them can be fixed. Just ask this amateur who went down the color science meme rabbit hole
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY1D6RkbYakI have shot portraits on phones, film, nikon, canon, and sony. No matter what you use there is always some color in someones skin that could use an adjustment. Most of the time it's ok if you leave it alone.
It used to be measured in reviews as "sensor metamerism index". Your eyeballs also have metameric error. But then the days of 32GB CF cards passed, everyone could afford a nice enough computer, and free raw processors got really good. Now any retard can open up a raw with an excellent starting profile that's ready to deliver as it is, eyedropper the funny patch, and move a slider 0.25". No one cares anymore except for fanboys arguing.
Even if you are shooting jpeg, go find whatever the option for color adjustments is and just nudge the sliders around and switch the modes until it looks good to you.
>>4409726Complaining about reds getting fucked up by the camera is actually far closer to reality (the reality of every brand, actually) than the usual memes that were actually based on auto white balance misses... which every camera has, especially under shitty LED lights. "Green tint" was bullshit. It was never an actual problem. It was an exaggerated meme among brand warring shills and fanboys. Most people who bought an a7iii and ran into a green tint just opened the auto white balance menu and fixed it, because AWB misses are universal to digital cameras. Even your phone has AWB misses.
Remember, sony has the majority share of the FF MILC market, and the a7iii outsold all of its competition combined. If it had bad colors, everyone would have bought the cheaper canon. Gimmicks like IBIS and an EVF dont take you to #1, or else this would be an olympus board.
