/p/ - Photography » Thread #4407433

[13 / 2 / ?]

64KiB, 720x405, Olympus-Pen-F-creative-profiles-product-2.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2025 03:39:19 No.4407433 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4407459 >>4407542

Does anyone use
>the dial
and if so, what are your settings to get SooC jpegs that don't require lightroom and RAW?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2025 04:33:17 No.4407459 Report

Quoted By: >>4407467 >>4407548 >>4407968

>>4407433
>olympus jpegs
lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2025 05:05:26 No.4407467 Report

Quoted By: >>4407471 >>4407534 >>4407557

>>4407459
doesn't taylor swift exclusively use olympus jpgs?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2025 05:09:57 No.4407471 Report

Quoted By:

>>4407467
I've never heard a better endorsement for not buying Olympus

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2025 10:04:18 No.4407534 Report

Quoted By:

>>4407467
She used to have a silver EM1 mark 1, and used the in-built filters for her instagram, yes. There's plenty of pictures of her using it out there, I doubt she still uses it, it's pretty old now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2025 11:03:05 No.4407542 Report

Quoted By:

>>4407433
The Dial is the worst and dumbest fucking gimmick.
>SooC jpegs
Shit. Shit across the board, really, but especially shit in M43-land. Some of those bodies and lenses can get images that are surprisingly sharp and naturally high contrast in raw form, but then the jpegs just BARF excessive noise reduction all over everything and then try to sharpen the blurry resulting mess, even with your camera's settings set to minimum/off noise reduction and sharpening. Absolute buffoonery.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2025 12:24:48 No.4407548 Report

Quoted By: >>4407887

>>4407459
yes, what do you have against them? do you think the only fucking company in the world who has decent jpegs is canon or fuji or something?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO olympus stacy vs sony tranny.jpg, 488KiB, 2019x1796

Anonymous Tue 18 Feb 2025 13:19:33 No.4407557 Report

Quoted By: >>4407962

>>4407467
Of course.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Feb 2025 17:53:48 No.4407887 Report

Quoted By:

>>4407548
>Shooting in jpeg in the first place

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Feb 2025 20:16:32 No.4407962 Report

Quoted By:

>>4407557
Gee, you have a picture of TWO trannies?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Feb 2025 20:42:58 No.4407968 Report

Quoted By: >>4407970

>>4407459
you seem like the only person that doesn't think Olympus cameras have nice jpeg engines

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Feb 2025 20:45:29 No.4407970 Report

Quoted By: >>4408125

>>4407968
That makes 3 just in this thread

No one has a good jpeg engine, just fuji by setting peoples expectations low and leaning into softness and fake grain (sharpening and NR is what camera jpegs suck at the most). Only ken rockwell would like the others phone tier shite.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 20 Feb 2025 03:29:07 No.4408125 Report

Quoted By:

>>4407970
>No one has a good jpeg engine
Tell me you've only ever used a Sony camera without telling me you've only ever used a Sony camera

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches