>>4412536No part of that sentence made sense.
>Higher megapixelsDoes fuck all to make a photo worse. It makes diffraction kick in a little sooner, and it reveals a shaky camera hand more often. Lower MP cameras "mask" these issues because of their lower resolution (read: blurry smeary shit). You can fix that in post with a light blur / noise reduction pass and you'd have the same result as shooting some PoS 4MP camera done perfectly.
Tl;dr: If high MPs are your problem, you have a skill issue.
>why would I not want the fastest reading sensor possibleI'm not sure what your understanding of this is, or even what you hope to get out of "the fastest reading sensor".
Mechanical shutters basically make all sensors equal in terms of "read speeds", and if you're using electronic shutter as your go-to (the only time sensor "read speed" matters), then lmao. Lmfao even.
Unless you're confused between read speed and FPS, which is what the anon you responded to was talking about. And even then, high FPS is not the golden ticket you think it is. It makes hard-to-time photos easier (like action sports, wildlife, portraits when your subject has parkinsons).
