Alright I'll try to provide feedback. Overall OP, there's not much in terms of interest with these. With photography, there needs to be some point of interest to draw someone to spend more than a passing glance looking at a photo. If the viewer's impression of a photo remains unchanged after a few moments of taking in a photo, the photo is a failure. There are tons of ways to create interest in a photo: subject matter, context, lighting, timing, perspective, etc etc. The most successful photos will combine multiple of these into an even stronger image. That's where you want to get to.
>>4413035Cop car pulled someone over. And? I instantly see what's happening and if I spend more time looking at the details and photos, the more I wonder why I am looking at this totally uninteresting scene in a totally uninteresting composition with nothing going on? The light is nice, but that alone can't carry this photo.
There's a way to shoot mundane scenes, but to make it worth it you need to do one of two things:
1. strip the scene down to it's absolute bare essentials (in this case, time it so no other cars are innth scene, or move so a damn try isn't cutting thru one of the main subjects, or change up your angle so you aren't shooting from eye level)
2. Make exploring the details of a more hectic scene worthwhile (you can see silhouettes in the cars, you time it so there's a gesture the person walking by is doing, you time it so there's moments in the background too)
>>4413037>General photos looking up at buildingAgain, what am I supposed to look at here? Why are you showing me something that I already have seen a billion times in the exact same way? Where are you as the photographer? Where is your personality, or attention to detail, or insight? Why should I spend time looking at this? You took these photos for a reason, but that reason isn't clear unless there was no reason, in which case that comes through loud and clear in these photos.
Go out and try again.
