/p/ - Photography » Thread #4413834

[29 / 8 / 1]

62KiB, 500x500, Tamron_AF031N700_AF_28_200mm_Super_Zoom_1232963209_423721.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 02:47:11 No.4413834 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4413839 >>4413856 >>4413865 >>4414603 >>4414729 >>4414824

Let me guess... you require more?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO pepega-cringe.png, 28KiB, 268x214

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 02:59:40 No.4413839 Report

Quoted By: >>4413840 >>4413841 >>4413844

>>4413834
this thing is prolly soft af and has hella chromatic abberation

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 03:01:41 No.4413840 Report

Quoted By:

>>4413839
go read a mft chart faggot

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 03:04:51 No.4413841 Report

Quoted By: >>4413844 >>4413846

>>4413839
so you're saying that you in fact, need more?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 03:15:17 No.4413844 Report

Quoted By: >>4413883

>>4413839
None of those factors stop a photo from being truly good
>>4413841
I need more wide angle

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 03:16:42 No.4413846 Report

Quoted By: >>4413856

>>4413841
>None of those factors stop a photo from being truly good
yea true, i agree

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 03:42:20 No.4413856 Report

Quoted By: >>4413859

>>4413834
Yes

>>4413846
They can. No one has disagreed with proof to the contrary. Just a lot of aimless seething and being mad at richer people.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 03:45:20 No.4413859 Report

Quoted By: >>4413862

>>4413856
I don't shoot with it because I'm poor. I shoot with it because it's a compact, lightweight one lens setup

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 03:50:51 No.4413862 Report

Quoted By: >>4413864

>>4413859
You don’t need more than one focal length to take a good photo.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 03:54:54 No.4413864 Report

Quoted By:

>>4413862
I never said that a zoom was required for a good photo. Strawman

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Vivtar f3.5-5.6 28-210mm Macro.jpg, 27KiB, 499x333

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 03:58:29 No.4413865 Report

Quoted By: >>4414737

>>4413834
For me, it's picrel
>Fairly sharp wide open and at max zoom, some softness inbetween but not unpleasant
>1:4 macro at max zoom in case you see a cool bug or flower
>A bit heavy but solidly built, could easily be used to defend yourself
>Slick DoF markers along its entire zoom range for zone focusing
>Smooth extension on the zoom along its entire range
>People WILL see your chunky 70s styling and ask you about your "cool camera"

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 05:26:38 No.4413883 Report

Quoted By: >>4413899

>>4413844
>I need more wide angle
The people who can pull off ultrawide shots without them looking like garbage impress me. Most shit wider than 24mm is poo

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_20250311-020729.png, 2MiB, 1080x1420

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 06:09:31 No.4413895 Report

Quoted By: >>4413899

Yes, I do need more. Those super zooms always sucked optically even compared to lenses of the same era.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Mar 2025 06:16:44 No.4413899 Report

Quoted By:

>>4413895
Skill issue
>>4413883
>Most shit wider than 24mm is poo
I still need the 24mm, those zooms were usually either 28 or 35mm

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Mar 2025 02:56:05 No.4414603 Report

Quoted By:

>>4413834

is this tamron in lensfun

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 91ChTR6A+qL.jpg, 677KiB, 1950x2560

Anonymous Thu 13 Mar 2025 03:22:39 No.4414606 Report

Quoted By:

for me its picrel

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 81UOyLR-ieL._AC_SL1312_.jpg, 190KiB, 885x1298

Anonymous Thu 13 Mar 2025 03:49:33 No.4414612 Report

Quoted By: >>4414624

Got this one for dirt cheap (<100$) because it was damaged
Cleaned it and replaced the missing rubber grip - it also had chipped glass, which was actually outside of the sensor area
No complains so far

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Mar 2025 04:49:45 No.4414624 Report

Quoted By:

>>4414612
Tamron makes great stuff. I used to always avoid it due to it being a second rate 3rd party manufacturer, but I've been really happy with it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Mar 2025 17:02:27 No.4414729 Report

Quoted By:

>>4413834
>not a 50mm prime with manual focus and aperture control only

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Mar 2025 17:27:26 No.4414737 Report

Quoted By: >>4414840

>>4413865
That's not even the good one though...

sage

sage Thu 13 Mar 2025 19:24:58 No.4414824 Report

Quoted By: >>4414840

>>4413834
why yes, i do need my nikkor 24-70 f/2.8 and 70-200 f/2.8 for landscapes, how could you tell?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Mar 2025 20:06:16 No.4414840 Report

Quoted By: >>4414843

>>4414737
which one is the good one?

>>4414824
>70-200 for landscapes

sage

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Einzelkämpfer in der Winter (...).jpg, 236KiB, 787x1200

sage Thu 13 Mar 2025 20:11:15 No.4414843 Report

Quoted By: >>4414866

>>4414840
yes, 70-200 for landscapes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Mar 2025 22:16:27 No.4414866 Report

Quoted By: >>4414868

>>4414843
>200mm
>f/8
You could have shot this on the lens in the OP. You don't need more.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Mar 2025 22:19:38 No.4414868 Report

Quoted By: >>4414871

>>4414866
>just have worse pictures all the time because in theory with certain settings so and so would be pretty close if posted on 4chan or instagram, the only audiences that matter!
Get a life

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Mar 2025 22:23:24 No.4414871 Report

Quoted By: >>4414874

>>4414868
>muh heckin' corner sharpness!
No one is peeping your boring ass prints of a tree on a hill lil bro

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Mar 2025 22:37:33 No.4414874 Report

Quoted By: >>4414876

>>4414871
>let me tell you whose opinions really matter
Get over yourself, child. You think like a woman.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Mar 2025 22:38:58 No.4414876 Report

Quoted By:

>>4414874
>child
Are you seriously pat posting on me right now?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 81mfaPEortL._AC_SL1500_.jpg, 73KiB, 1500x813

Anonymous Thu 13 Mar 2025 23:02:00 No.4414880 Report

Quoted By:

Having used different Tamron lenses in the past, I definitely appreciate having access to some of the nicer models even if it's from stumbling across a rare good deal. I wouldn't have really regretted paying more for picrel.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches