>>4414370Not a single good, publishable picture itt.
A whole bunch of MISSED potentially good ones.
A few that can be salvaged by better cropping, to get rid of distracting garbage (pic related). Most can't, because you cut off the subject's feet, or some detail of background that would have made the picture, etc. (eg.
>>4414385).
Some COULD have been good, but were not meant to be because of shit out of your control. Like
>>4414374, this would be very good, but the cars ruin it. Yeah, I would be bummed to skip this one too, but tough shit, nobody except you cares that it's an ALMOST good picture. Come back another day. Look at your pictures through the viewers eyes, not your own.
Finally some are just fucking garbage that I can't fathom what you were even thinking when printing them, like what the fuck is this
>>4414384 even. Or
>>4414382, or looks like a failed phone selfie that should have been deleted immediately after.
Like someone already said, good for you for actually walking up to people (and for grifting art school kids out of 50 bucks I guess). But think what you want to achieve BEFORE you take a picture. And then learn to filter out what didn't work, because it won't always work. Or most of the time.
