/p/ - Photography » Thread #4424662

[63 / 18 / 1]

Using AI to Critique Photos

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 20:38:00 No.4424662 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4424663 >>4424664 >>4424721 >>4424788 >>4424939

I made a custom Gemini that is designed to analyze photography from a neutral perspective.

Every single photo that I put into it gets a 4.5-5.5/10. If I don't use the rule of thirds, it bitches about me not using the rule of thirds. If I do use the rule of thirds, it conveniently doesn't even mention it.

I don't think AI is truly capable of critiquing a photograph in the same way that a human is, but it's really the only way I can get actual feedback on my photos. I do worry about refining my style in the wrong way; attempting to appease the AI instead of just doing what I like.

Does anyone else do this?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1719085426880091.png, 52KiB, 1664x633

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 20:40:04 No.4424663 Report

Quoted By: >>4424665

>>4424662
Here are the full custom instructions.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 20:40:26 No.4424664 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424662
creative and interesting thread idea
but this is soulless and depressing. See if theres any photography clubs in ur city maybe?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 20:41:26 No.4424665 Report

Quoted By: >>4424666

>>4424663
if i send you a photo can you put it into the ai and send what it says? could be fun

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 20:42:14 No.4424666 Report

Quoted By: >>4424668

>>4424665
Yeah, go ahead and post it. I'm just watching baybawl right now so I'll reply fairly quickly.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO fillm-4035.jpg, 5MiB, 3917x2611

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 20:47:15 No.4424668 Report

Quoted By: >>4424670 >>4424671

>>4424666
>4424666

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1737427596097898.png, 279KiB, 1005x577

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 20:49:26 No.4424670 Report

Quoted By: >>4424671

>>4424668
Here is an analysis of the photograph:

**Composition:** The image employs a central composition, drawing the eye towards a path framed by foliage. The leading lines of the path create depth, but the symmetry is somewhat static. The framing is effective in isolating the subject, but the lack of a clear focal point within the path weakens the composition.

**Lighting:** The lighting is a key strength, with a warm, golden glow emanating from the end of the path. This creates a sense of depth and mystery. However, the contrast between the highlights and shadows is quite high, potentially losing detail in both areas.

**Focus:** The focus appears soft throughout the image. While this may be intentional, it detracts from the overall sharpness and clarity. A sharper focus on the path or surrounding foliage could have enhanced the image.

**Exposure:** The image appears slightly underexposed, with some loss of detail in the shadows. The highlights are well-controlled, but the overall brightness could be increased to improve clarity.

**Color:** The colors are warm and inviting, with a predominance of greens and yellows. The color harmony is pleasing, but the lack of variation could make the image feel somewhat monotonous.

**Subject Matter and Visual Impact:** The image evokes a sense of tranquility and invites the viewer to explore the path. However, the lack of a clear subject and the soft focus diminish its overall impact.

**Rating:** Based on these observations, the photograph would receive a rating of 5/10. While it demonstrates some strengths in lighting and color, it could be improved through sharper focus, more dynamic composition, and a clearer subject.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 20:53:11 No.4424671 Report

Quoted By: >>4424672 >>4424673

>>4424668
>>4424670
FWIW though, I really like your photo. It's got a very dreamy aesthetic and the colors are interesting. I like how you utilized the focus on the leaves to create the frame, and the way that the blurred path in the distance interacts with the frame.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 20:57:55 No.4424672 Report

Quoted By: >>4424674

>>4424671
https://voca.ro/1aDMbz0p0ku6
vocaroo of me critiquing its critique because i dont feel like typing

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO img00715.jpg, 4MiB, 2780x4107

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:01:39 No.4424673 Report

Quoted By: >>4424674 >>4424675 >>4424676

>>4424671
thanks :) i like this photo alot too, i shot in on my fuji x-t1 and i just love how that thing captures foliage colors and light. If i remember right it was a long exposure in pure darkness, with a streetlight a little ways away so thats the light your seeing and why it looks so dreamy.
here's another photo for it to crit

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1737619299241884.png, 219KiB, 1005x569

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:04:39 No.4424674 Report

Quoted By: >>4424675 >>4424676

>>4424672
I've also noticed that it does seem to contradict itself a lot, and I agree with your points about something always being in the middle. Any time I've used it to generate an image, the subject is always dead center, no matter how I try to engineer the prompt to make it less uncannily symmetrical.

>>4424673

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:05:27 No.4424675 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424674
>>4424673
The photograph presents a collection of roadside signage attached to metal poles, set against a backdrop of a clear sky and a commercial area.

Composition: The central focus is on the cluster of signs in the foreground, dominated by a partially obscured red stop sign. The composition lacks a clear subject and does not effectively utilize principles such as the rule of thirds or leading lines to guide the viewer's eye. The multiple vertical poles create a cluttered and somewhat static feel. The background elements, including buildings and parked cars, are visible but do not contribute significantly to the overall composition.

Lighting: The lighting appears to be natural daylight, likely from the side, as evidenced by the soft shadows cast by the signs and poles. The quality of light is even and does not create strong highlights or dramatic shadows. The exposure seems balanced, with no significant areas of over or underexposure.

Focus: The foreground elements, including the stop sign and the smaller instruction sign, are in sharp focus. The background elements gradually fall out of focus, creating a shallow depth of field. This draws attention to the signs but does not enhance the overall visual interest due to the unengaging subject matter.

Exposure: The overall exposure appears to be within an acceptable range, capturing detail in both the highlights and shadows of the signs and the surrounding environment. The contrast is moderate.

Color: The colors are natural and appear accurately rendered. The red of the stop sign provides a point of contrast against the blue sky and green grass. The white and black text on the signs is legible.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:05:58 No.4424676 Report

Quoted By: >>4424677

>>4424674
>>4424673
Subject Matter and Visual Impact: The primary subject matter is mundane roadside infrastructure. While such subjects can be part of documentary or street photography, this image does not present them in a particularly compelling or insightful way. The partially obscured stop sign and the collection of other signs lack a clear narrative or visual interest. Compared to examples of strong street photography, this image lacks a decisive moment, intriguing subject interaction, or a unique perspective.

Rating: 4/10

Actionable Insights: To improve, consider focusing on a more singular and visually interesting subject. Experiment with different compositions, such as getting closer to a specific sign and utilizing its shape or texture as the primary focus. Pay attention to how light interacts with the subject to create more dynamic and engaging imagery. Explore incorporating elements in the background that add context or visual interest to the foreground subject.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:13:06 No.4424677 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424676
more vapping
https://voca.ro/1hSWh1KEttst

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO j.jpg, 4MiB, 4896x3264

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:17:11 No.4424681 Report

Quoted By: >>4424682 >>4424683 >>4424684

heres one last picture before i go write some bullshit essay
this one is purposefully shitty and badly edited, lets see how it likes it lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:21:03 No.4424682 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424681
Fucking lmao. Get this.

This photo captures a person sitting outdoors, seemingly engaged in writing or drawing in a notebook. The natural light suggests it's daytime. The background features trees, and what appears to be some sort of construction or infrastructure project.

Rating this photo is subjective and depends on what criteria we consider. Here's a breakdown of potential aspects and a general rating:

Strengths:

Candid Moment: It seems to capture a genuine moment of someone focused on their activity.
Natural Setting: The outdoor environment provides a pleasant backdrop.
Intriguing Subject: The act of writing or drawing can be engaging.
Potential Weaknesses:

Composition: The subject is quite central, and the background, while natural, isn't particularly striking or well-defined.
Lighting: While natural, the lighting appears somewhat harsh, with potential for blown-out highlights or deep shadows, though it's hard to say for sure without more detail.
Clarity/Focus: The overall clarity of the image isn't exceptionally sharp.
Overall Rating:

Given the candid nature and pleasant setting, but considering the somewhat average composition and potential lighting/clarity issues, I'd rate this photo a 6 out of 10.

A higher rating might be warranted if the story behind the person's activity or the context of the location were known, or if the technical aspects of the photo (lighting, composition, focus) were more compelling.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:23:16 No.4424683 Report

Quoted By: >>4424684 >>4424685

>>4424681
I accidentally put it into the main bot and it gave it a 6/10. Didn't realize it until I posted the response here, so I deleted it quickly. Here's the updated response:

The composition centers the subject, a person writing in a notebook, which occupies a significant portion of the frame. The rule of thirds is not explicitly utilized. The background includes trees, a partially visible vehicle, and what appears to be a construction or infrastructure project with metal scaffolding. These elements provide context but do not significantly contribute to the main subject's visual impact.

The lighting appears to be natural daylight, resulting in strong highlights on the subject's forehead, arms, and the notebook, and deep shadows under the brim of the cap and on the side of the face. The quality of light is harsh, lacking diffusion, which creates high contrast and reduces detail in both the bright and dark areas.

The focus is primarily on the subject, with the face and hands appearing relatively sharp. The background elements are out of focus, creating a shallow depth of field that isolates the subject.

The exposure exhibits a wide dynamic range, leading to blown-out highlights and potentially underexposed shadows. The overall brightness level seems adequate, but the contrast is high.

The colors are natural, with greens dominating the background and muted tones in the subject's clothing. The white balance appears neutral. The color palette does not contribute significantly to the image's overall impact.

The subject matter, a person engaged in writing, is clear. However, the visual impact is somewhat diminished by the harsh lighting and the less engaging background elements.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:23:47 No.4424684 Report

Quoted By: >>4424687

>>4424681
>>4424683
Based on these observations and in comparison to established photographic norms, this image would be rated a 5 out of 10. While the subject is clearly defined and in focus, the composition lacks dynamism, and the harsh lighting creates exposure issues and unflattering shadows. Improvement could be achieved through consideration of compositional guidelines, waiting for more diffused light, or utilizing techniques to manage the dynamic range.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:24:28 No.4424685 Report

Quoted By: >>4424686 >>4424687

>>4424683
what was the updated score/10?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:25:29 No.4424686 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424685
oh nvm. thats halarious that this got a 5/10 and the other one got a 4. dont trust this thing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:25:48 No.4424687 Report

Quoted By: >>4424708 >>4424764

>>4424685
5/10 as seen here: >>4424684

I legitimately don't think it's capable of giving anything but an average score. Let me try it with an Ansel Adams photo or something.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1737819224693033.png, 1MiB, 1500x1104

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:28:29 No.4424688 Report

Quoted By:

AA is rolling in his grave right now.

Response:
The photograph presents a landscape featuring a body of water in the foreground and a mountainous backdrop under an overcast sky.

Composition: The central framing places the primary mountain range prominently in the middle ground, flanked by another significant landform on the right. The body of water occupies the lower portion of the frame, providing a horizontal base. The rule of thirds is not strictly adhered to, with the horizon line positioned near the lower third. Leading lines are present in the diagonal slopes of the mountains, directing the viewer's eye towards the center and background. The balance is somewhat symmetrical due to the central placement of the main subject.

Lighting: The overall lighting appears diffused and even, consistent with an overcast sky. This results in soft shadows and a lack of strong contrast. Highlights are present on the snow-capped peaks, but they are not overly bright. Shadows are present in the valleys and on the shaded sides of the mountains, but they lack significant depth.

Focus: The focus appears to be sharp throughout the frame, from the foreground water to the distant mountain peaks. This creates a sense of overall clarity and detail in the scene. The depth of field is extensive, ensuring that all elements are rendered with similar sharpness.

Exposure: The exposure seems balanced, with no apparent clipping in the highlights or blocking of detail in the shadows. The tonal range is present, but compressed due to the diffused lighting. Contrast is moderate.

Color: As the image is presented in monochrome, color accuracy and harmony are not applicable. The tonal variations in grayscale provide the visual information.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:29:01 No.4424689 Report

Quoted By:

Subject Matter and Visual Impact: The mountainous landscape is the primary subject. The scale of the mountains conveys a sense of grandeur. However, the overcast lighting and central composition result in a somewhat static and less dynamic visual impact compared to images with more dramatic lighting or a more engaging composition.

Data-Driven Comparison: Compared to a broad dataset of landscape photographs, this image exhibits competent technical execution in terms of focus and exposure. However, the diffused lighting lacks the dramatic quality often seen in highly rated landscape photography. The central composition, while straightforward, is generally less dynamic than compositions utilizing the rule of thirds or strong leading lines to create depth and interest. Many stronger landscape photographs within our dataset leverage light and shadow to sculpt the terrain and create a more compelling visual narrative.

Rating: 6/10

Actionable Insights: To enhance similar photographs in the future, consider waiting for more dynamic lighting conditions, such as golden hour or the interplay of sunlight and clouds, to add contrast and visual interest. Experimenting with compositional techniques, such as placing the horizon line according to the rule of thirds or utilizing strong foreground elements, could create a more engaging image. Exploring different perspectives or vantage points might also yield a more compelling representation of the landscape.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Untitled-4.jpg, 277KiB, 1276x851

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:34:28 No.4424690 Report

Quoted By: >>4424693 >>4424750

what if i engineered some in photoshop to be the best possible photo?
lets see
it wants either leading lines or rule of thirds
central subject
even lighting
deep depth of field

try this one, it should like it alot

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:37:11 No.4424693 Report

Quoted By: >>4424694 >>4424750

>>4424690
You managed to achieve a higher score on this one, congrats.

>Full response:
Here's an analysis of your photo:

Composition: The image employs a strong central perspective, using the bridge's structure as leading lines that draw the eye toward the dog. This creates a sense of depth and focus. The subject is centered, which can sometimes be static, but in this case, it emphasizes the dog's isolation and journey.

Lighting: The lighting appears soft and diffused, likely from an overcast day. This reduces harsh shadows and provides even illumination across the scene. The lack of strong highlights or shadows contributes to a somewhat muted contrast.

Focus: The dog is sharply in focus, making it the clear focal point. The background gradually blurs, enhancing the subject's prominence.

Exposure: The exposure seems balanced, with no areas appearing overly bright or dark. However, the overall tone is slightly muted, which may reduce the image's overall impact.

Color: The color palette is predominantly neutral, with grays and browns dominating. This creates a somewhat melancholic or serene mood. The white of the dog provides a contrast, drawing attention to it.

Subject Matter: The white dog running on the bridge is a compelling subject. Its isolation against the bridge's structure and the background creates a narrative element, suggesting movement or a journey.

Rating: 7/10. The photo demonstrates good use of leading lines and focus to emphasize the subject. However, the muted colors and slightly flat lighting could be improved to create a more dynamic and visually engaging image.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 21:39:18 No.4424694 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424693
it doesnt want harsh shadows, but it wants strong shadows? lmao
it doesnt want anything 'too' bright or dark, but it doesnt like that its 'muted'
this thing is halarious

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 22:14:04 No.4424708 Report

Quoted By: >>4424711

>>4424687
my lowest score was 7 kek
I even got a 9,5

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 22:25:51 No.4424711 Report

Quoted By: >>4424713

>>4424708
Show us

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO I'm so cracked.png, 208KiB, 1970x1072

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 22:31:56 No.4424713 Report

Quoted By: >>4424715

>>4424711

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Prompt.png, 208KiB, 1950x942

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 22:32:59 No.4424714 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 22:34:52 No.4424715 Report

Quoted By: >>4424717

>>4424713
show us the photos, bro

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 22:36:20 No.4424717 Report

Quoted By: >>4424718

>>4424715
I'm aware that it's not a real 9,5
>>4424535

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 22:37:27 No.4424718 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424717
stellar

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO MDR_6063 edit 3-2.jpg, 1MiB, 1280x1920

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 22:42:53 No.4424720 Report

Quoted By: >>4424723 >>4424724

I once uploaded this to IsItAI.com, and it thought it was AI. Now I'm curious how an AI would rate it.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO ai shitjew.png, 827KiB, 1038x947

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 22:46:14 No.4424721 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424662
>AI propaganda
Yeah na, AI is jewish, and jews lie, so yeah

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO !.jpg, 104KiB, 499x641

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 22:47:16 No.4424722 Report

Quoted By:

Wait, this isn't /pol/...
>Fucking jews

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO result 1.png, 191KiB, 1924x1032

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 22:49:34 No.4424723 Report

Quoted By: >>4424749

>>4424720

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO result 2.png, 170KiB, 1688x1016

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 22:50:37 No.4424724 Report

Quoted By: >>4424749

>>4424720
Wow amazing

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 8e3.png, 618KiB, 570x957

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 23:04:02 No.4424726 Report

Quoted By: >>4424728 >>4424755 >>4424990

>I don't think AI is truly capable of critiquing a photograph in the same way that a human is, but it's really the only way I can get actual feedback on my photos. I do worry about refining my style in the wrong way; attempting to appease the AI instead of just doing what I like.
You are retarded if you think asking a fucking language model for critique isn't anything but a massive waste of time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 23:08:24 No.4424728 Report

Quoted By: >>4424770

>>4424726
Posting on a forum full of bitter snapshitters on a Japanese anime website is an even bigger waste of time, but here we are.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 23:45:58 No.4424749 Report

Quoted By: >>4424750

>>4424723
>>4424724
Interesting. This AI seems to favor center compositions and heavy contrast.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 23:52:34 No.4424750 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424749
yeh. we learned alot of that with this >>4424690
>>4424693

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 May 2025 01:16:28 No.4424755 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424726
I have been working on something similar for some time. It's harder than you think. Teaching taste and style is so subjective.

I got tired of paying for https://aftershoot.com/ and wanted to try a homebrew solution.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 May 2025 02:30:33 No.4424764 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424687
Try having it review a racist image.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 May 2025 04:05:19 No.4424770 Report

Quoted By: >>4424825

>>4424728
Plenty of people here have technical knowledge and give solid advice. If you'd rather talk to a computer fuck off and do it

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 May 2025 08:14:14 No.4424788 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424662
Feed it goatsee. Let the AI tell us how insightful it really was.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 May 2025 14:09:22 No.4424825 Report

Quoted By: >>4424942

>>4424770
nice gaslighting

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image_2025-05-05_235512160.png, 2MiB, 1357x2000

Anonymous Mon 05 May 2025 22:55:32 No.4424939 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424662
if you take a henri cartier bresson photo and run it through the ai, what score does it give?
take this one for example

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 May 2025 23:15:51 No.4424942 Report

Quoted By: >>4424945

>>4424825
He is correct.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 May 2025 23:25:33 No.4424945 Report

Quoted By: >>4424948

>>4424942
Nobody here has talent, and nobody gives solid advice. Everyone is just bitter

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 May 2025 23:50:18 No.4424948 Report

Quoted By: >>4424959

>>4424945
You admit that you are bitter and have no talent. Why would/should anyone believe you?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 May 2025 01:35:14 No.4424959 Report

Quoted By: >>4424963 >>4424964 >>4424981

>>4424948
I have more talent than everyone here combined. My pics would be in magazines if I knew how to send them in.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 May 2025 01:38:28 No.4424963 Report

Quoted By: >>4424965 >>4424967 >>4424972

>>4424959
Let me guess. You're too good to ever consider posting your photos on here, right?

I've won 500 highly competitive photography awards and I think there are people here who know what they're doing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 May 2025 01:38:54 No.4424964 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424959
send. oh wait you wont.
plus who the fuck reads magazines anymore?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 May 2025 01:39:55 No.4424965 Report

Quoted By: >>4424969

>>4424963
ive won 501. bravo!

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 May 2025 01:44:05 No.4424967 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424963
https://voca.ro/12dubhOOexDf

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 May 2025 01:49:45 No.4424969 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424965
Simple fool. I have won 500 awards from highly competitive competitions. My wins must be in the thousands from simpler and lesser competitions. I stopped mingling with the peasantry long ago.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 May 2025 02:05:37 No.4424972 Report

Quoted By: >>4424976

>>4424963
Idk brother, all I'm saying is that I was the chief photojournalist for my high school's newspaper and I got a full ride to college for photography.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 May 2025 02:20:58 No.4424976 Report

Quoted By: >>4424980

>>4424972
I may remember accepting your application/viewing your portfolio. I was feeling generous that day because I just got news of 18 more photography awards I earned that week.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 May 2025 02:42:13 No.4424980 Report

Quoted By: >>4424986

>>4424976
Alright mr. AI.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 May 2025 03:32:48 No.4424981 Report

Quoted By: >>4424986

>>4424959
My dad works for Nintendo. Wat nau?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 May 2025 03:52:27 No.4424986 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424980
It is alright. It is very alright.

>>4424981
Cool story bro. Doubt he has as many photography awards as I do.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 May 2025 06:20:34 No.4424990 Report

Quoted By:

>>4424726
this slop is just as unhelpful and retarded as asking for critique here but without op risking being called a faggot

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

Using AI to Critique Photos