>>4428691>That shot of the overpass is insanely goodIt stresses me lol, i vaguely saw the image on my mind but was a pray n' spray in one of the first times i had a camera on my hand as a teenager, had a massive reflection from the car window and i haven't been able to replicate it even when i've been to the spot several times.
It's a random pic that was also a Photoshop miracle because it wasn't supposed to be keeper, i took a shot at deleting the reflection to see my skills 10 years later when i found it on an old drive. Yet a lot of people tell me about the B&W version.
>price of these things are ridiculousBeen ranting about it for a couple of years now too, got the Olympus at 20 dollars with everything included, it's still 30 to 35 in the States but the one i really wanted, the Olympus Verve which could be considered a mu/Stylus 500, is off the fucking charts for aesthetic reasons. Although i am now seeing it went down in price to "only" 70 dollars.
> I really only like these kinds of cameras for the flash nowI am pretty bad at that, i've seen you used it in some pictures on daylight but i don't know when to pull it, that or the sun shines differently there. I keep seeing a similar edit style in the highlights but haven't sit down to analyze it well, you usually see reflections and textures together very nicely, looks like those fancy interior shots from the 70's and 80's.
Still i think the set you did at a pool party is the signature, blew my head out when i first saw it posted here, it's outrageous Y2K.
