/p/ - Photography » Thread #4430488

[18 / 2 / 1]

169KiB, 1875x1258, fx2.jpg

Anonymous Wed 28 May 2025 15:02:37 No.4430488 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4430502 >>4430582 >>4430597 >>4430692 >>4430708

Now that the dust has settled, what do we all think about the new Sony FX2?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_J_1dJndLhc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwCQ1GSabPs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGw2yrGX5Nw

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO media.zenfs.jpg, 153KiB, 2400x1350

Anonymous Wed 28 May 2025 15:10:20 No.4430492 Report

Quoted By: >>4430493

>Snoy colors despite every attempt to grade them correctly
>Stealing panasonics ideas
>shoots 4k60 in a DX crop despite being "built for video first and foremost"
>base iso 800 2nd iso 4000, literally micro four thirds DR
>literally an a7cii with stolen panasonic technology
>undoubtedly will present with build quality issues like the a7cr/a7cii disintegrating weather sealing

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 May 2025 15:12:13 No.4430493 Report

Quoted By: >>4430563

>>4430492
>base iso 800 2nd iso 4000, literally micro four thirds DR
good bait

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 May 2025 15:55:12 No.4430502 Report

Quoted By: >>4430601

>>4430488
We have a gear thread, take this shit there and stay there!

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 May 2025 18:21:44 No.4430563 Report

Quoted By: >>4430707

>>4430493
This is clearly just a rebranded lumix gx9 with a fake sensor surrounding the real (micro four thirds) sensor. look at how small that lens mount is. it blocks most of the sensor. and the base ISO just happens to be 800? the sony fx2 is a micro four thirds camera. specifically, a sony branded gx9.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 May 2025 18:47:18 No.4430576 Report

Quoted By:

Tiltable EVF should be more common on regular photo-centric cameras as well.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 May 2025 19:29:21 No.4430582 Report

Quoted By:

>>4430488
4k60 1.5x crop halfway into 2025 is adventurous of Snoy, for a cinema camera no less

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 May 2025 20:40:50 No.4430597 Report

Quoted By:

>>4430488
More fecal matter from Sorry.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 May 2025 20:46:16 No.4430601 Report

Quoted By: >>4430614

>>4430502
Shut up, party-pooping backseat moderator.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 May 2025 21:54:47 No.4430612 Report

Quoted By: >>4430708

not that many improvements from the FX desu, think I'll just keep my FX1

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 May 2025 22:04:31 No.4430614 Report

Quoted By:

>>4430601
>we are having a pretend party where we all discuss the latest snoy
sad

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 May 2025 02:40:00 No.4430653 Report

Quoted By:

when you want an fx30 that can also take ff stills

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 May 2025 05:43:47 No.4430692 Report

Quoted By:

>>4430488

Why didn't the put the ZV-E1, FX3, A7SIII sensor in that thing? They really missed out.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 May 2025 07:02:46 No.4430707 Report

Quoted By:

>>4430563
>a fake sensor surrounding the real (micro four thirds) sensor
a sensor surrounding a sensor? You think these things are like legos?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 May 2025 07:05:33 No.4430708 Report

Quoted By: >>4430711

>>4430488
>>4430612
Exactly. Manufacturers should stop putting effort into incremental upgrades.

This hobby is dying. Sales have fallen off a cliff. Companies should put their efforts into more rare upgrades with technological breakthroughs instead.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 May 2025 07:16:50 No.4430711 Report

Quoted By: >>4430715

>>4430708
>I want cameras to come out every 5 years so new and used prices never lower and I have to pay top dollar for old technology

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 May 2025 08:08:00 No.4430715 Report

Quoted By: >>4430720

>>4430711
> thinks 5y was a long time lmao
> thinks this would affect used prices
retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 May 2025 08:36:24 No.4430720 Report

Quoted By:

>>4430715
Apple's trashcan Mac Pro has had
unjustifiable high prices both in the new and used markets because for the longest time Apple didn't release a new one. In 2019 you would have had to pay $2000 to get a subpar workstation with hardware from 2013, now they throw them at you because of the new models.

Canon L glass does not get down in price because of age, but because of newer models. The 50mm f/1 still costs the same in the used market because there is still nothing new from Canon that replaces it, and until the RF lineup came out the same could be said for the L zooms. Retard.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches