>>4444721>RFNo third party = slow death.
>NikonThey're putting Z mount on RED cameras. Total opposite of your doom posting. Z mount can support DX medium format. Idiot gearfags sleep on this because admitting it would also mean admitting E mount isn't too small.
>SonyE mount is robust and well designed. it can support that shit. Any extra tech is going to be added outside the mount. Electronics do not have to be inside. Sony has a mount flange that can host an extra interface and maintain backwards compatibility. There is no reason to replace E mount unless the market demands lenses faster than f0.7 on FF.
>Fuji XWill persist as the only budget system worth buying, essentially what micro four thirds wanted to be but wasnt competently ran enough to accomplish
>GFXOnly normal person friendly MF system. Fuji would be dumb not to milk this forever.
>hasselblad X systemThis Hasselblad has always been kind of scammy. Short lived.
>L mountEssentially dying. Might have a future in... chinese made camera drones, and nothing else. Panasonic keeps making unusably shit, non competitive cameras that are basically a nikon mirrorless from 5 years ago with every possible video codec enabled. Any other company using sony sensors could slaughter panasonic with one decisive move: enable every video mode every sensor supports on every camera. Leica SL isn't even worth mentioning because basically no one uses it.
The brightest future is canon gets over themselves and licenses to viltrox/tamron/sigma, and RF/Z/E persist for 20+ years.
here is what will actually happen:
Canon will widen the pro/nonpro gulf in their product lines. You can buy the low DR 240fps sports FF or the m43 vlogging camera.
Sony and Nikon will continue being the only traditional "real" camera companies like we're used to.
Fuji will continue being the budget hobbyist version of sonikon.
Panasonic will die like olympus and pentax already did.
