>>4453027It all depends on what you value in a camera (low light performance, ergonomics, compactness, etc), what your budget is ($1400 is the absolute maximum?), what your used + new market is like (terrible or good, for example I'm American and I can get a Z30 or R50 from the manufacturer refurbished for $400-480 USD), and whether you're going to stick to the hobby or you're just flirting and might not stick to it (decides whether you're going to spend close to your budget max or spend half as much)
Panasonics fucking suck, don't buy one. Horrible reliability and only good for video.
Most modern cameras have some form of image stabilization. In body (IBIS, used by Sony Pentax Olympus Panasonic) is good for short lenses or vintage lenses. In Lens (VR by Nikon, IS by Canon) is good for long lenses but can make lenses more expensive + older pre-2000 lenses might not have it.
Personally if you take mostly stills/landscapes you won't get the full advantage of the a6700's autofocus which is meant for sports/wildlife. And if you value compactness you're probably not gonna pick up a DSLR let alone a full frame one like a Canon 5D. Maybe look at Olympus EM1s? For $500-600 its great if you pick up a EM1 Mark II, M5 Mark III, or M10 Mark IV used. Otherwise I'd be checking out the Canon R50 or Nikon Z30 but I'm American and can get those for $4-500.
If you really want to stretch your budget you can find a Sony A7C which is a REALLY nice camera since its a modern full frame but it might be closer to $1500 in your market (its $1000-1200 here).
