>>4451631>My opinions mean you're TERRIBLE! I have never seen a contact print in my life, but I know you are WRONG for doing them!You are actually so stupid it is hilarious. I enjoy alternative processes that require contact printing, DUH. They also produce better looking prints, and I enjoy the workflow more. Worth it for me, doesn't mean you have to do it. Insane you have to ego to tell someone else they shouldn't be using the camera they want to use. Disgusting, honestly.
The still life has clear and obvious flow to the image. It goes from the bottom upwards in a triangular way towards the right upper third. This was intentional and the blocks of wood also add to this. The chicken elements are supposed to feel somewhat confined within the wooden blocks. It was my intent to do that, and it further adds to the meaning I created in the image.
The more stupid shit you post the more I know you are the one that legitimately sucks at photography. I only think Im average, but I know you SUCK. No photo needed! Thanks!
The egg hand picture also has a clear flow to it from the... uneven lighting! The bottom of the picture is darker and moves up towards the light and the hay at the bottom also gives it flow! The eye is immediately drawn to the brightest egg in the picture, the one in my hand, and then my crushed hand afterwards and the other eggs and hay that create a context for the whole scene. Try to be a little smarter with your critiques. Yeah?
Both the egg hand picture and the still life are well exposed, they have the lighting I wanted, they're in focus, framed well. Nothing wrong with the execution of them at all. I was able to make excellent albumen prints with the still life, which requires very specific exposure and contrast.
Why are you so obsessed and so so determined to just sound as stupid as possible?
