>>4469271Street photography is not and never has been art.
Without a veneer of nostalgia and historical interest it is all crap. All of it. Good street photography has never existed and can not exist. The moment supposed street photography becomes inherently good, it stops being street photography by definition and slips into another genre unnoticed such as abstract portraiture, documentary, new topographics, humanism, etc, and labeling it mere street photography is disrespectful to the photographer’s vision and intent.
The snap you didn't post would be magically appealing if it were taken 40 years ago. This is a sad fact. Street photography is about as interesting as taking photos of buildings.
>>4469275i don't have anything prepared yet
>>4469277what am i pretending? i explicitly gave my complaints with the photos itt. do you disagree with them? if anyone sounds pretentious, it's you. or do you honestly feel the same looking at this
>>4469220 compared to this
>>4462066 (sorry to single you out anon, but it was simply the latest post)?
