>>4459542Since you're not a retard, you can read up -->
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_(linguistics)I meant the camera you're already carrying with you when you're out-and-about, implying it's not the camera that automatically takes a good photograph, but the photographer himself (or herself); I was typing more stuff and preferred to keep the idea simple because also 4chan has character limits.
But hey, at least my subpar thread sparked some unorthodox creativity. Might I also suggest developing some more basic human decency and empathy so that leads on to help less skilled photographers in a Photography forum... instead of patting yourselves on the back doing something excessively cumbersome to prove yourselves to whoever for whatever reason? Or is this a board where the same people make these kind of threads over and over, pushing away newcomers?
But don't get me wrong, if there's a need to keep up the quality on /p/, I mean, that's fine. It's just not very realistic, in my opinion.
