>>4471615Get the 100v, I’ve seen reviews suggesting that they didn’t change the lens between the v and vi, and it doesn’t like the new 40mp sensor.
Also you save a decent amount of money for almost the same thing in a lot of other areas.
>>4471427Yeah, I see your point. Most of the Fuji lenses are a good amount lighter, but there’s a surprising number where the FF is pretty comparable.
I know what you mean about the pop and the dimensionality and everything. I’ve been looking at Zf albums vs Xt or X-pro and the Zf often looks nicer, even to me. I figure part of it is that the average Fuji redditor isn’t great at post, but Cam Mackey’s side-by-side review definitely the Zf looking that little extra bit better, even on youtube quality. And he didn’t fuck up the xt5 results to make a point, they also looked amazing.
Granted, his xt5 and zf results both look immensely better than anything people are posting on reddit lol.
I wish Nikon had a more consistently compact lens lineup, although several of the third party fast 85mm lenses are actually lighter than the Fuji 56mm equivalent.
At the end of the day, the option of the hybrid OVF on the x pro is really cool and there’s just something about the Fuji lineup makes me love the idea of going out and shooting with it. And chicks love the retro look.
But, the Nikon is better for the money, beats them on autofocus, and has all the usual FF benefits, 3d pop, micro contrast, dimensionality, etc. it’s not a huge difference at social media sizes or small prints, but it’s there. Nikon is also better at adapting, but I don’t want to spend a ton of money on a giant vintage lens collection anyway.
