>>4461745Dude you're not shooping a hobo on a photo. You are TAKING a photo of a hobo.
You don't need to take the hobo photo. Yet you do so. A "photo" has no value in itself, unless the one with value is the photographer's name. Taking a photo of a hobo is wanting a photo of a turd, a random street, a blank paper.
I wouldn't take a hobo photo because it just isn't a subject. That's why I ask why would anyone snap hobos, or random people off the street for that purpose. I don't understand the appeal of street photography at all, that's why I ask if it's just bloating portfolio to get hired and take newspaper pictures of crime scenes and other utility shit.
