>>4464928I think it goes without saying that if you work in a studio and are only printing magazine covers, you can get away with much worse gear than you would prefer otherwise and it's more about what the money source thinks it looks like (and your relationship with the relevant brand) than what it actually is. Based terry took the lowest effort possible photos on a lumix gf1+kit zoom and got published, and people now know him for that instead of the canon DSLR he usually used. Mostly because of who was in the photos, and what he got them to do.
I could use a z6 (not even a II) or even micro four thirds for paid work, but I use a z7ii because day to day I like to have superior dog fur/pine needle definition and it's literally 3 cameras in one, very useful, worth the money.
>45mp>26mp mraw>20mp DXJust because a nepobaby used a fuji once doesn't mean it's a wise use of money for non-nepobabies general use and /p/ is generally justified in thinking fuji makes rattly, unreliable overpriced, faux-luxury junk for fashion victims (because they do). Since micro four thirds encompasses plenty of small, retro bodies for applications where peak image quality is irrelevant and looks are, it's a legitimate alternative to fujifilm. Simply shoot raw and select your film sim later.
>>4464977More magazine shoots have been done with the canon 5dII and 5dIII than basically any other cameras so if magazines are the standard, we should all go out and buy a 5d ASAP
