>>4464263Alright nigga, astro is super fun but beware it can be a money sink depending on what you want to do. Terrestrial photography is going to be less demanding. The moon is easy since it's lit well and your gear will suffice. Planets are a bit harder but it mostly comes down to planning and having a clear night available.
For terrestrial photos you need a *giggity* errecting lens, since telescopes invert the image vertically by default. You probably got one with that $20 accessory pack you spoke of.
Set your budget and buy whatever Nikon, Canon, or Pentax DLSR floats your boat. Preferably full-frame but APS-C will do as well if you're on a budget. Get the camera and the T-mount and you're basically set to take some motherfuckin' photos. Telescope elements generally aren't held to the same standard as camera lenses in terms of image quality (to a certain point; expensive telescopes get fancy AF), so keep that in mind.
>Full frameSomething like a Canon 5D II or Nikon D700 would be sub $400 USD and a mount adapter would be $30.
>APS-CIf that's too much for you a Pentax K30 or Nikon D7000 would be half as much.
>PhoneAnd finally you can get away with just buying an adapter for your phone for $20 if you'd rather not spend anything.
