>>4473962>zf $2.4kjesus fucking christ
>$1.5k for an ancient fujiwhat the fuck is wrong with you people
get your head out of the gearfag gutter idiot. if youve been reading brand war shit on /p/, these people literally lie and spout nonsense that doesnt matter in real life because they have buyers remorse after spending $2.4k on a 24mp full frame camera, a kit zoom and a plastic prime. none of what they discuss has SHIT to do with real life camera use. you notice fuji hate exploded when the xm5 plus kit lens was just $800? lotta people with two fucking grand of 24 megapixel nikon got a bit upset at that and layed it on. never ask a gearfag about the last time he needed his weather sealing. either they're super gearfaggy and always use the big fucking zoom, or they could have just covered their camera.
digital camera setups should not be that much over $1.5k... for NEWER FULL FRAME SHIT, not a fucking x-t3. dont get scammed by these gearfag idiots. digital photographers are OBJECTIVELY THE STUPIDEST PEOPLE ON EARTH right now. don't end up like them.
sony aps-c like a6000, $250-500, maybe up to $1k for the newest one (aka pointless gearfaggotry)
sony ff like a7iii, a7c, $800-$1000 (dont go newer its pointless gearfaggotry, dont go older they kinda suck)
nikon z6 mk1 or z6 mk2 are basically the same camera, so buy the mk1 for <$750, its just a sony a7iii with slightly worse AF-C
canon r50, r10 kits, $500-$750
canon r7 $1000ish i think? it varies
canon rp not even $1k
ff dslrs like d750, 5dii, 5dii, 6d, $350-500
aps-c dslrs, open facebook market they're borderline free
how the fuck do people spend $2k+ on ff or $1500 on apsc? by being stupid gearfags who watch too much youtube
and only buy local, online sellers are scamming youtube idiots and /p/ tier subhuman gearfaggots to make up for ebays 15% fees
