>>4472977>youyou you you.... do you fucking wormtrans shills think there's only one person that knows this info and values it...talking like everyone is the same person. there are many people here on /p/ who hate snoy and fujishit because micro four thirds makes better cameras. open youtube sometime. we're everywhere. the clock is ticking for your oversized sensor cope. the walls are closing in. phones are getting micro four thirds sensors, nikon is getting global shutter and AI autofocus, and then it's over for snoy and fujishit forever. you are out of the camera market. micro four thirds is replacing you. buhbye snoy fool framer and worm copers.
>I-ITS HYPOTHETICALboth articles show definitively that xtrans is a lower resolution CFA that still has moire issues and fuji marketing lied
thats why they still have no market shae
>NO XTRANS IMAGES!one has xtrans images the other is theory. and theory is valid.
digital photography is math
digital cameras are soulless math machines
and this shit gets reposted because fuji's shills are aggressive anti-m43 schizos with no REAL weather sealing
just look at any xt5 or x100vi review and they implicitly admit xtrans is garbage. it needs a sharper lens but is also softer than the cheapest 25mp m43.
last /gear/ some fucking faggot was lying and saying micro four thirds had no advantages
that is a literal fucking lie. a g9ii will blow any snoy a7iv the fuck out in dynamic range sharpness autofocus video IBIS weather sealing etc and the lumix gh7 is a higher resolution, higher IRL dynamic range, more useful camera than literally everything fujifilm makes that isn't crop MF
know your place fuji shill
fuji has no market share despite lying and shilling non stop
olympus has no market share because the yakuza laundered all their money away and panasonic has very little because no marketing budget
panasonic and om system make better cameras than fujifilm deal with it. GH7 and om1ii objectively > xh2. om5ii objectively > x100vi.
