>>4475505>No one shoots nikon ZI mean that's kind of true. Outside of japan nikon has very little market share. The supermajority (80%) of people shoot canon or sony and you won't find much hate for either outside of /p/, while non-/p/ autists are quick to shit on nikon for weird colors, green tints, oversized and expensive gear, and shitty autofocus. Right now a ton of people are trying to get out of their nikon gear and ebay is oversaturated with 24-120s, 40mms, 28mms, z6ii/z7iis, and japanese sold ZFs.
>>4475485And other things you only hear on loser nobody hangouts like /p/...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMfCDujQywYIt's actually nikon and modern canon EOS R cameras that have the worst color
I've noticed this even on /p/ while /p/ users aren't aware of their own color. Canon RP and DSLR shooters have amazing colors, but canon R6/R5 shooters with the new modern sensors have really bad colors with fucked up blues and greens. Sony shooters have very lifelike, organic colors that aren't too vibrant and nikon shooters have a wall of indistinct greens and vibrance overload. Sony, fuji, and classic canon skin tones are mellow and smooth. Nikon skin tones are radioactive. Nikon DSLRs were also the worst cameras for color, notorious for a green tint.
>>4475497It's a $1699 camera but doesn't deliver its price point. You could buy a cheaper x-t50 and have the same camera, because the only relevant upgrade is alleged weather sealing (and bulk)... and fuji is notorious for not having actual weather sealing. x100v, x100vi, x-t5, x-h2, despite being fairly unpopular and almost no one using them IRL (super low market share, lower than nikon) there are a lot of reports of all of them dying in a drizzle.
Coping fuji fanboys here never shut up about when sony had equally shit weather sealing because unlike sony, fuji never improved.
If you can return it and buy a cheaper x-t50, do.
