>>4481954>to get the godly rednecks to murder the annoying, educated, value-producing half of its populationi know you felt smug by saying this, but that's not what it is this time.
the first civil war was south fighting for billionaires right to own slaves. they even fired first.
this civil war is the coasts fighting for billionaires rights to own the entire populace as slaves. even then most slave owners were jewish...
this time, the slave owners are still racist (against all non-jews), but 1/2 the people fighting back are also racist because the slave owners attempted to use forced mass migration to replace and alter the composition of their property-populations ethnicity. the billionaire slave owners are attempting to neuter the second civil war by having racists and non-racists fight each other. both sides are being simultaneously pandered to and told to hate each other. this is the little war.
if the racists win, they will absorb the antisemitic left, make a bunch of honorary aryans out of them, and the real civil war is on. states that are against this modern form of slavery will fight the ones that are for it (coastals this time, not confederates). and the coastals will, again, fire first. not on a fort this time. on federal law enforcement.
if the non-racists win, they can easily be manipulated into believing that they are in the wrong, to stop being antisemitic (after receiving a concession like reduced irael aid and some netanyahu shaming), and keep being replaced. in that case the civil war is off.
afaik kamala was ran to test if the "little war" needed to be provoked further, and trump was ran to try and start it early to ensure a coastal win against a less organized, more divided center.
canada is being antagonized by trump to make sure they stay out of it UNLESS they will help the coasties. in case you were confused as to why "the man who is DEFINITELY from the racists side" was bullying a country that did *literally nothing*