>>4482594>>4482597>The field of sharp focus on a hyperfast character centric prime is shaped like a dome with wavy edges. The test chart is flat.Which does not explain why the quality is absolute crap throughout the entire image and why the effect is vastly, VASTLY less pronounced on higher quality lenses (ding ding ding).
>Go buy another snoy gm lens you soulless hack.Not an argument.
>How did so many photographers WHO ARE VASTLY MORE SUCCESSFUL THAN YOU use the EF 50mm f1.2L hmmm?Appealing to people using it is not "science". Some people eat shit, it doesn't mean it's good.
>Its soft and unusable just look at this photo of a brick wall and zoom in!Strawmanning, it's only been said that the optical qualities of the lenses are poor, which they are, and absolutely no one denies it. People praise it because it adds a certain style to the image. This is subjective.
>All you know how to photograph is boring shit trees, starts, and walls.Making up characters in your mind to argue with them
>Fucking test chart pixel peeping gearfaggots like you are slowly but surely ruining photography. Didn't know I had that power.
>Why not complain about focus motor noise and focus breathing next?I'm not shooting video, but it is a problem to people shooting video. Unless you're going to appeal to "people who've used noisy lenses successfully in the past" to deny any complaint.
>Gearfaggot videography is the same autism as pixel peeping but it had a real world applicationSchizophrenia, you're bringing another topic to the discussion just to sperg about it. It's all in your head.
>>4482600>Leave canon. Go buy snoy.Mentally ill brand fanboy, as I suspected. You're not here to prove a point, you're here to defend Canon at all cost and shit on Sony, which again no one talked about here, not even in the provided links. Making things up just to cry about them seem to be a leitmotiv in your posts.
