>>4485791>>4485792Oh, cool, I genuinely didn’t know that.
I just assume all modern lenses are huge for no reason the way Sony, Nikon, and most of the non-Chinese third party lenses are.
Just looked these up and Canon should really be leaning on this more in their marketing. That’s the only modern AF 50mm I’ve seen that’s a normal size or comparable to a film lens.
Will definitely consider this, there’s still something about the Fujis that I like, but I can see the value of getting real FF and semi-compact packaging on both body and lens, even at the cost of vintage-style ergo and controls.
I think I have weird hands, I learned on my dads film cameras, and the ergonomic blobs just feel off to me, no matter what the science says.
I will say this, looking at the R8, I like the look of the way Canon designed the blob-handle. Having the shutter button more on the front face makes way more sense if it’s gonna force your hand into that position. Shutter on top works great on vintage shape bodies, but always felt off with the Nikon ergo grips that I’ve used.
Also, on a silly level, I do have a positive image of Canon from all the sponsorship they had in National Geographic back in the day
Are people on more of a budget mostly adapting EF, or are the new RF lenses worth the money to avoid the adapters?
