/p/ - Photography » Thread #4488991

[31 / 3 / 1]

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 21:01:10 No.4488991 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4488993 >>4488995 >>4489002 >>4489003 >>4489022 >>4489061 >>4489093 >>4489267 >>4489675 >>4490043 >>4491089

What makes pic related so uncanny and unpleasant to look at? Is it the lack of shadows? Why would a photographer go for such effect?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 21:05:35 No.4488993 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488991
because its photoshopped

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 21:35:02 No.4488995 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488991
good from far but far from good?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 23:03:06 No.4488999 Report

Quoted By:

I dislike how much it brings out the skin and hair texture on top of being excessively bright.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Dec 2025 23:56:02 No.4489002 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488991
it's the overdone old lady tanning bed back that clashes with the peach not as tanned cheeks

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 00:03:32 No.4489003 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488991
> What makes pic related so uncanny and unpleasant to look at?
Too many local adjustments imo

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 02:43:23 No.4489016 Report

Quoted By: >>4490219

I'm actually a little serious when I wanna find out what gear inthecrack used for their high res pics of women's assholes, they always had the crazy 10mb pictures where I could see any little shitstain they left behind

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 03:35:14 No.4489022 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488991
I feel like it should be cropped to just the ass and a bit of thigh.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 10:52:33 No.4489061 Report

Quoted By: >>4489083 >>4489092

>>4488991
The colours are wrong. Probably taken with a sony. Skin should not be magenta.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 14:41:43 No.4489083 Report

Quoted By: >>4489087

>>4489061
I thought they made skin green?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 15:44:32 No.4489087 Report

Quoted By: >>4489092

>>4489083
The issue is the green/magenta colour balance, they're always either green or magenta. Can't be fixed in post.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 16:05:44 No.4489092 Report

Quoted By: >>4489095

>>4489087
>>4489061
Its shot on a canon

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 16:08:10 No.4489093 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488991
I find this image very pleasant to look at if you know what I mean

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 16:10:21 No.4489095 Report

Quoted By: >>4489126

>>4489092
Nope. Sony. Nice lie, kid.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 19:35:53 No.4489126 Report

Quoted By: >>4489132 >>4489263 >>4489588

>>4489095
>s-sony has to be bad, in every thread
Olympus is still out of business and released the em5iii 3 times because sony apsc and ff destroyed any reason micro four thirds had to exist

Sony won. They did more than just win. They drove pentax, olympus, and panasonic into the dirt. Shilling on 4chan wont change the broader market. Your favorite brands are dead. Sony killed them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 19:56:35 No.4489132 Report

Quoted By: >>4489134

>>4489126
Retarded, or replying to own bait?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 19 Dec 2025 20:18:20 No.4489134 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489132
Both.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 09:12:14 No.4489263 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489126
Funny how you didn't mention Canon because all professionals use Canon. No Canon = not pro. Just facts. Sorry about your bruised ego, you can get butthurt all you want, it's the objective truth. No professional would accept Sony images and no one paying a professional will be content with Sony images. Just facts.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 10:58:39 No.4489267 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488991
Most probably homosexuality

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 20 Dec 2025 11:00:49 No.4489268 Report

Quoted By:

If this were /ic/, I'd say body proportions and perspective are all wrong.
The combination of the hips being so much wider than the waist (perspective distortion?) and the lighting dropping off too quickly between cheeks and back (local adjustments?) suggests that the lower body is completely detached from the upper body.
The lighting also makes everything look fake, but I can't explain that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 21 Dec 2025 20:22:49 No.4489588 Report

Quoted By:

>>4489126
it's just deepstate wikipedia trannies trying to solicit donations from that one australian schizo that sends them $5 every time someone makes a snoy post

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 07:09:30 No.4489675 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488991
>anus_peek
kino

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 22 Dec 2025 10:20:46 No.4489700 Report

Quoted By:

imagine taking off her panty and just getting in there and licking her ass

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Dec 2025 20:58:07 No.4490043 Report

Quoted By: >>4490190 >>4490651

>>4488991
>lust provoking image
>irrelevant time wasting question

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 24 Dec 2025 22:47:03 No.4490190 Report

Quoted By:

>>4490043
>4chan.org

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 25 Dec 2025 04:58:29 No.4490219 Report

Quoted By: >>4490272

>>4489016
I had those printed at max resolution on D size paper and framed on my walls back in my twenties. Everyone thought it was funny to see my nice apt decorated in high res asshole art, until my friends wife popped over to get him, looked around, stormed out and never spoke to me again lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 25 Dec 2025 18:29:09 No.4490272 Report

Quoted By:

>>4490219
There's a significant percentage of women whose entire self-worth has been based on the market value of their vagina. Nothing is a stonger denial of their self worth than someone who places their poop hole as more important than their life giving slimy hole. Most humans are simple animals.

Zach !ozOtJW9BFA

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO D9_37_567_1200.jpg, 124KiB, 1200x840

Zach !ozOtJW9BFA Thu 25 Dec 2025 21:42:13 No.4490297 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 25 Dec 2025 23:49:48 No.4490305 Report

Quoted By:

The lighting setup has been designed to provide maximum coverage from all angles.
The photographer likely wanted to work fast and cheap, so he's not shooting this like an artistic shoot. He's trying to get the maximum number of ok shots in as short a time as possible. What you end up with is the very flat 80s Style porn mag look that we see here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Dec 2025 22:59:02 No.4490651 Report

Quoted By:

>>4490043
It neither provokes lust nor is an irrelevant question in my view. Color accuracy matters

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC06242.jpg, 2MiB, 1565x2500

Anonymous Mon 29 Dec 2025 21:39:17 No.4491089 Report

Quoted By:

>>4488991
I went round to sex my ex and took this. We all know why this is better.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches