>>4490734The R6III has probably moved less than 100 units by now so there's zero chance anyone here has one yet.
That being said you can probably make some basic assumptions about it: It's a moderately high-res FSI sensor with a slighty faster readout speed than the R6II (like 10% faster woo). It's basically the same as the Mark II except it'll be a bit worse in low light and a bit better when cropping / printing very large. That's about it.
The lens however I use somewhat regularly and it's alright. Emphasis on 'alright' and not 'good' or 'great'. It's main plusses are that it's small, light, and cheap. The slow apeture sucks on the long end and I rarely use it beyond 70mm where it starts at f5.6. It relies heavily on distortion correction that cannot be turned off especially at the 24-28mm zone, where it has mechanical vignetting (bad). I use it as my travel snapshit lens and that's it. It's convenient.
If you're hell bent on an R6 (any Mark), I would suggest getting either the RF 24-105 f/4L IS which is heavier and like 2x the price OR getting two primes like the RF 35mm f/1.8 and RF 85mm f/2.
