Quoted By:
The image quality is pretty bad. Almost headache inducing. Enough to outcompete the mediocrity of the plain, i was there and moved on nature of the photos.
Shitty little low res cameras arent good for messes of sticks and harsh contrast. You can mitigate this by learning to shoot handheld panoramas for more resolution and bracket and merge to HDR for better contrast handling but its hard to do both
To use a shitty camera for nice photography you must get close to everything and avoid having a lot of distant detail and wild contrast in the frame. Thats why micro four thirds is fine for macro shots of tiny bugs and zooming way in on tiny birds. Proper cameras still look better, but its fine.
Photos like these are digitals weak point and unless you can swing a d810 around or afford a modern ff like an a7RIII or nikon z7 they would look a lot better shot on 35mm film, and them scanned on the olympus in pixel shift mode (film does in 1 shot what digital needs 4+ to approximate). Well shot 35mm film can be scanned for over 100mp of detail, if your camera can do it.
