[141 / 20 / 1]
Quoted By: >>4497141 >>4497153 >>4497166 >>4497172 >>4497175 >>4497179 >>4497196 >>4497206 >>4497231 >>4497508 >>4497646 >>4498294 >>4498310 >>4498692 >>4499423
Ones you've actually used.
Give reasons.
1. Panasonic - pleasing JPEG, best QOL - lots of features that work well.
2. Fujifilm - decent but I didn't like the JPEG detail rendering.
3. Olympus / OM system - decent, but I don't didn't like the JPEG colors (tans pushed to red).
4. Sony - lots of features on paper but they're half-baked and riddled with needless incompatibilities.
Give reasons.
1. Panasonic - pleasing JPEG, best QOL - lots of features that work well.
2. Fujifilm - decent but I didn't like the JPEG detail rendering.
3. Olympus / OM system - decent, but I don't didn't like the JPEG colors (tans pushed to red).
4. Sony - lots of features on paper but they're half-baked and riddled with needless incompatibilities.
