>>11569172>>11569233I get it, anon is coping hard. And his argument is off base.
But at the heart of it, something rings true:
>"why buy merchandise for an old event that you didn't even go to?"Is it a zoomer thing? In my day, if you wore a concert shirt to school, but didn't actually go to the concert, you'd get your ass kicked (happened to me, when I caught a kid wearing a Van Halen '87 Tour shirt, I beat him up so bad he pissed himself and I didn't even get suspended because the Vice Principal sided with me, he shouldn't have been a poser).
