>>14566402What an unbelievably retarded misunderstanding of how this all works.
>That's why he settledPeople and corporations who are in the right settle all the goddamn time. They do it when it's financially easier to payout versus paying legal bills on the back end.
>then he would've pursued his counter suit against herBased on fucking what? Defamation? Slander? First of all, he would have to prove she was lying, which is nearly impossible to do in a he-said, she-said like this. Second, he would've haven to prove that her allegations caused damage. But we already know that WWE did not fire him over this.
You're a stupid mongoloid and only furthering these completely retarded narratives that people use all the time surrounding court cases; as if these civil cases, regardless of how they turn out, have any actual bearing on the truth.
